Users Online Now:
2,132
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,818,444
Pageviews Today:
2,675,537
Threads Today:
725
Posts Today:
15,126
09:44 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:nomuse (not logged in) 2380183:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzMwMzU4MjA3XzIyOTI0Q0Y5] [quote:Anonymous Coward 5040935:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzMwMzU3MDYyXzVGNDVEQkM4] Isn't it accepted that the media in '68 was made to film a 3rd hand projected image of the live video stream on a wall which accounts for the crappy (even by 60's standards) video quality? [/quote] No. The media was given the highest possible format conversion in the standard method practiced at the time -- essentially the same method used to archive live television shows by the broadcast media themselves, and the method used to distribute shows originally broadcast in NTSC to other markets using PAL or similar. The actual lunar broadcast was not NTSC. Big metropolitan stations of the period were broadcasting several MEGAwatts, and their subscribers were expected to be within thirty miles. By any standards, the Apollo broadcasts were extremely low-power, limited-bandwidth. They broadcast in a slow-scan format, black and white for Apollo 11 and color-sequential for the later missions. So there is simply nothing that anyone of the period other than a few special-built displays could do with the original broadcast stream. It HAD to be converted to something that could be beamed to ordinary subscribers. [quote:Anonymous Coward 5040935:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzMwMzU3MDYyXzVGNDVEQkM4] The MIAC report has references to moon landing hoax although it's in the same paragraphs as Bob Barr voters, environmental extremists and a dozen other unrelated groups so make what you want of government paranoia and bungling. [/quote] [/quote]
Original Message
This blows every other moon-hoax documentary out of the water.
Man went
230,000+ miles
(460,000+ miles round trip!) into space in the 1960's. Since then, no country in the world has "had the budget" to go more than
400
miles into space. Are you effing kidding me??!!
Apollo Zero
Did you ApolloTards realize that lasers can be reflected off the natural lunar surface?
Where is your proof that the lasers are actually hitting retro-reflectors and not just bouncing off the surface?
PIN THIS
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>