Users Online Now:
2,141
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,004,106
Pageviews Today:
1,673,959
Threads Today:
675
Posts Today:
12,051
04:38 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Raphael:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzM2NjE1MDc1X0I0QUVCNUU4] [quote:Halcyon Dayz, FCD:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzM2NTU2MjAxXzlFQTc0OEQ4] [quote:Raphael:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzM2NTUzODIyX0ZEMTBFMDQ=] Why has all human activity in 'outer space' since Dec. 1972 taken place in the safe zone? i.e. only about 300 miles up? [/quote] Going beyond LEO only makes sense if you are actually going somewhere, the Moon, Mars, the asteroids. And safe is relative. LEO is a bit safer then cis-lunar space. Earth blocks half the sky from meteorites, and the VARBs block some of the charged particle radiation. [quote:Raphael:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzM2NTUzODIyX0ZEMTBFMDQ=] In the last 40 years, it appears NASA has had no desire to send humans beyond the safe zone...? Why? [/quote] NASA has many desires. They would just love to get the kind of funding they got during the late 60s. They how ever do not call the shots. [quote:Raphael:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzM2NTUzODIyX0ZEMTBFMDQ=] Outer space seemed 'safe' up until 1972, and now outer space appears really hostile? [/quote] Space hasn't changed. People's priorities have. Sooner or later an eccentric billionaire will pay the 50 million that a seat on the proposed Russian lunar fly-by costs. [quote:Raphael:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzM2NTUzODIyX0ZEMTBFMDQ=] Space 'the final frontier' went from being a manageable 'vacuum' to being filled with nasty cosmic forces? [/quote] No. Space has always been nasty. We can handle most of the nasty. "We" have lost the will to do it. [quote:Raphael:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzM2NTUzODIyX0ZEMTBFMDQ=] Let me know if the Chinese venture out beyond the safe zone... [/quote] That prolly won't happen for at least another decade. The Chinese have a very methodical step-by-step approach. Why not just register a space news feed? :book: [/quote] u are full of BS answers >> rehearsed and rebleated often? - obviously I do ponder why folks volunteer to be NASA stooges? Can you tell me what the biggest prize of all is regarding the MOON controversy? Here are the choices as I see them. 1/ Prize given to mortal man for ACTUALLY walking on the MOON arriving via the "SUN God Apollo" Space program? ta da!! the EAGLE St. John has landed?? hahaha why is the SUN god Apollo mucking around the MOON? *wink wink nudge nudge* 2/ PRIZE for PRETENDING to go the MOON - putting on a really big show worthy of an Oscar for special effects? 3/ Ultimate PRIZE My favorite reason for mucking around the MOON would be to eventually help control the weather down here on earth. The weather, Mother Nature, this is our nemesis since genesis. To control the weather would be 'god like' and quite the feat. We share a barycenter with the MOON. It can affect our ocean tides and also the emotions of 'we the sheeple'.... Esoterically the MOON is associated with our subconscious mind...with the collective unconscious as Herr Jung might remark. Please do get back to me - I suspect answer #3 raises the stakes regarding the 'Solar Apollo' MOON Landings? WTF Too bad 'we the sheeple' are symbol/archetype illiterate. I would also love to see a HI-RES image of the LUNAR surface showing in great detail the SPACE JUNK left on the lunar surface. I would love to see an image worthy of 'google maps view' technology showing 40 years of cosmic dust accumulated on the Lunar Rover? Instead we get fed BS grainy low res images of the Lunar surface? Another NASA FAIL They had magnification technology/cameras in the 1960s that could take Hi-Res images from 100 miles up. It is not what NASA claims they did ... it is what they continue fail to do since that makes things seem suspicious. #3 might just be the real reason the NASA Never A Straight Answer NAZIS are screwing around with the MOON and keeping 'we the sheeple' in the dark about their motivations. Have you heard of PROJECT HiVOLT? >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HiVOLT Evidently some wanker scientists think we have no need for the Van Allen belts? PhDUH we have a bunch of science wankers wanting to drain the Van Allen belts like vampires ... BUT WAIT! We have another scientist, Michael Persinger who actually claims the electro-magnetic field of the earth contains ALL THE MEMORIES of ALL the people who had lived in the past and those of us living today. So maybe Project HiVOLT would be like erasing the hard drive? cheers, [/quote]
Original Message
This blows every other moon-hoax documentary out of the water.
Man went
230,000+ miles
(460,000+ miles round trip!) into space in the 1960's. Since then, no country in the world has "had the budget" to go more than
400
miles into space. Are you effing kidding me??!!
Apollo Zero
Did you ApolloTards realize that lasers can be reflected off the natural lunar surface?
Where is your proof that the lasers are actually hitting retro-reflectors and not just bouncing off the surface?
PIN THIS
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>