Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,313 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 939,614
Pageviews Today: 1,252,251Threads Today: 309Posts Today: 4,852
10:22 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject The FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) of the Theory of the 188-day cycle. Everything you need to know!
User Name
 
 
Font color:  Font:








In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Original Message Your question: What the theory of the 188-day cycle says?

I will tell you EXACTLY what the theory of the 188-day cycle says...


On 27 February 2010, a very big earthquake of magnitude 8.8 in the Richter scale happened off the coast of Chile.

The theory of the 188-day cycle says that, starting in that date, 27 February 2010, each 188 days, a big earthquake, with magnitude above 7.0 in the Richter scale, would happen somewhere in the world. The quake would happen in the exact date, OR ONE DAY BEFORE OR AFTER THE DATE.

Since the theory said the count would start on 27 February 2010, and the intervals would be of 188 days, the theory predicted earthquakes above 7.0 in the Richter scale in the following dates:


(+ 188 days)

- 03 September 2010 (or one day before or after)

(+ 188 days)

- 10 March 2011 (or one day before or after)

(+ 188 days)

- 14 September 2011 (or one day before or after)

(+ 188 days)

- 20 March 2012 (or one day before or after)



You can calculate those dates yourself, using this date calculator:

[link to www.timeanddate.com]




Well, you may ask: is it possible to predict the exact or approximate dates of big earthquakes above 7.0 in the Richter scale?

The answer is: Mainstream science says: NO. It's not possible. This is what mainstream science says.





You may ask: and how usual are earthquakes above 7.0 in the Richter scale?

The answer is: on average, they happen one time every month, but it's impossible to know exactly in which day of the month it will happen.





So, you ask: if the Theory of the 188-day cycle gives a time window of 3 days for the quake to strike (the exact date, the previous day, and the day after), what are the probabilities of the Theory having a "hit" just "by coincidence"?

The answer: it's very easy to calculate. The month has 30 days. Any given interval of 3 days represents one tenth (1/10) of the month. So, there is a 10% probability of a "hit" by coincidence.






Now, the big question you should have: WHAT HAPPENED IN THE PREDICTED DATES? The predicted quakes above 7.0 in the Richter really happened?

The answer is: IN ALL OF THEM! 100% PRECISION!

The dates and quakes:



04 September 2010 – Christchurch Earthquake 7.1
(the day after the exact date)


11 March 2011 – Japan Earthquake 9.0
(the day after the exact date)


15 September 2011 – Fiji Earthquake 7.3
(the day after the exact date)


20 March 2012 - Mexico Earthquake 7.4
(the exact date!!!!)



WOW!!!!

FOUR HITS!!!


So, if the probability for each hit is of 10 percent, then what is the combined probability of having FOUR HITS???

It's just 2.5% of probability.

That's right. 97.5% percent of probabilities of being wrong, and the predicted quakes NOT happen in the predicted time frames. But they happened...

Now, you know. Make your own judgement...
Pictures (click to insert)
5ahidingiamwithranttomatowtf
bsflagIdol1hfbumpyodayeahsure
banana2burnitafros226rockonredface
pigchefabductwhateverpeacecool2tounge
 | Next Page >>





GLP