|
REPLY TO THREAD
|
|
Subject
|
Mark of Cain = Birthmark
|
|
User Name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Font color:
Font:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original Message
|
Revelation 19:16 – On his robe and on his thigh he has this name written: KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS.
(By Maurice 'Moe" Bedard) - This one Bible verse, “Not so; if anyone kills Cain, he will suffer vengeance seven times over”, and God “set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him“ Genesis 4:15 has puzzled historians for centuries.
What exactly is this Mark that was set upon Cain?
A. Was it a tattoo of a cross or some other artificial marking put upon Cain?
B. Could it be a curse that he would have to carry with him as a wanderer of the earth for his sins?
C. Maybe it was a marking on his skin that his descendants would also be born with. Hence, a birthmark signifying they are descendants of the allegorical story of the fable of Cain that is based on some hidden truth or meaning concealed in the above said story?
The “Mark” is a birthmark signifying they are descendants of the allegorical story of the fable of Cain. A Birthmark that a certain blood line whose allegorical genealogy is written and also concealed in mystery throughout the Old and New Testaments. A royal family whose descendants bore a special birthmark throughout Biblical days and the beginning of this 6th age that we are in now.
You see, I will prove below that Cains descendants may see that the mark of the Lord is the impress of some spiritual excellence, distinguishing the characters of those of whom it is predicated. You will find that throughout history that the mark of the intelligent is the strength of their knowledge: and these marks are the gifts of Lord.
Here we need to understand the importance by observing the fact that the mark set upon Cain was the mark of the Lord. It is distinctly written that the Lord set a mark upon him. It was a mark, not to indicate a curse, but to distinguish for preservation. This paramount in understanding the significance in the hidden meaning of this mark which I have stated above is really a birthmark that is bestowed on certain descendants of a Biblical Royal family.
The Mark set upon him was to preserve Cain and his blood line.
Not to destroy him or his kin for his murder was the first killing of another human and also the first and quite possibly the only forgiven homicide known to mankind. These for we know without a doubt that the Lord thought he was special enough to forgive and only set a mark upon him and his future descendants.
Back in ancient days, there was no means to perform any type of scientific DNA testing or blood analysis to determine 100% a person’s ancestry. With no means to test blood, they had to invent ways to properly identify long lost family or even immediate family. Taking someone’s word or quite possibly even a deceiving women bearing a royal child who would become a King or Pope just for their word was not the wisest things to do when so much was at stake over the last 2,000 plus years.
Therefore, the Birthmark will play a central role throughout recorded history in the 6th age.
If you study history up until even now, you will find the primary method to determine a persons family was by their Birthmarks. These Birthmarks tend to occur often in the same family line and often, these Birthmarks will occur in the same body parts as a previous ancestor. Hence, this was a common practice for our ancestors who will find often used them for much more than identification. Just as it is common today to identify the diseased by birthmarks, tattoos and other various markings on the body.
Below I have included quotes from various Historians from our ancient past like the great Plutarch and Plato. Also more modern day Holy Grail Historians such as Philip Gardner and Mark Amaru Pinkham.
Plutarch had to say this about the divine birthmark in his book, On the delay of the divine justice;
“as the warts and birth-stains and freckles of fathers, not appearing in their own children, crop out again in the children of their sons and daughters; as a certain Greek woman, giving birth to a black child, when accused, of adultery, discovered that she was descended in the fourth generation from an Aethiopian; as among the children of Pytho the Nisibian, said to belong to the Sparti,1 the one who died lately bore the impress of a spear on his body, — a race-mark after so many ages rising and emerging as from the depths of the sea, — so not infrequently earlier generations conceal and merge ancestral habits and dispositions, while afterward and through later generations the inherited nature comes to flower, and reproduces the family tendency to vice or to virtue.
The armed men that sprang from the teeth of the dragon sown by Cadmus, from whom the oldest families in Thebes — a large part of the Boeotian aristocracy — were said to have descended. Something like this mythical birthmark had probably made its appearance on the body of a member of one of these ancient families. Nisibis was a Syrian city with an extensive commerce, with many Greek, and probably some Boeotian immigrants.
It may be that, in cases where the inheritance of a morbid physical constitution, or of proclivity to moral evil, seems to lapse in the first generation and to reappear in the second, the children of the diseased or depraved father have the physical or moral traits of their father, but are made and kept vigilant and faithful in self-care and self-discipline by the memory of their father’s infirmities or sins ; while their children have the inheritance without the warning.”
READ MORE: [link to knightstemplar.tv]
|
|
Pictures (click to insert)
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | | | Next Page >> |
|
