Where is the youngest crust on the Pacific Plate?

[link to commons.wikimedia.org]

Where are the supposed subduction zones?
---
A good Expanding Earth Theory Introduction

The issue of the "Pacific Subduction Zones" (there are none, there are only zones of rising material) is the bold faced lie cornerstone.

This obvious lie is damming up a series of other science theories accepted as fact, right up to Einstein.

Geologists were among the first group of scientists that got the "cone of silence" placed by the government, from knowledge which became apparent in the 70's.

They hold the most obvious piece of evidence that the whole popular structure of astrophysics from the evolution of stars etc is based on, is seriously lacking.

How can anyone who looks at this map,

[link to commons.wikimedia.org]


make it in any way make sense with this "theory" which is claimed as fact?
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Answer, you can't.

How can the youngest rock of all be in the supposed "subduction" zones?


The idea that the earth has not expanded rapidly from the inside-out, but the common idea that the earth only gains slight mass from meteors, etc., is the Flat Earth idea of the modern age.

It should be noted that along with gaining sea-floor from this unknown mechanism, the planet is also gaining water.

It might generally be speculated then that when the sun grows through this same process, that it gains hydrogen, and that as Mars grows it will acquire oceans.

(and as Jupiter grows, well, go figure)

Here is an interesting source I just found, Nikola Tesla's own words in 1935. I have not had time to read it or think about it yet.

[link to en.wikisource.org]

"Condensation of the primary substance is going on continuously, this being in a measure proved, for I have established by experiments which admit of no doubt that the sun and other celestial bodies steadily increase in mass and energy and ultimately must explode, reverting to the primary substance....."
Nikola Tesla