Users Online Now:
Donate To GLP
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 17183506:MV8xODg2MzEzXzMxNTA1ODY1XzcyRUE3OTM1] [quote:Anonymous Coward 6733501:MV8xODg2MzEzX0FFQzk2MzI0] Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remaied a constant variable throughout time? [/quote] Time itself may not have remained constant over 'time'. If time moved faster in our 'past', then would carbon-dating show this? Probably not. If the universe was caused by some approximation of a 'Big Bang' creation concept, and if the universe is expanding from that point, then who is to say that the rate of expansion has remained a 'constant' since the beginning? If the universe is expanding, and if that expansion is slowing down, can time then be said to be perhaps slowing down as well? [/quote]
Living snails that carbon-date to 2,300 years old, a living seal that was carbon-dated at 1,300 years old, and 8,000-year-old living penguins.
Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remained a constant variable throughout time?
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd. Godlike™
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.005s (5 queries)