Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 2,307 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 1,012,342
Pageviews Today: 1,687,819	Threads Today: 683	Posts Today: 12,161
04:45 PM

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject Why is every single picture of Hilary Clinton so bad???

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

Original Message What is the agenda with this. Without doubt there is one.

I have wondered for YEARS why every single solitary picture of Hilary Clinton is horribly unflattering.

In every pic her face is distorted in some way, she's making a weird face, she looks ancient, she looks fat or bloated, she looks like a complete scag, she's doing something crazy.
I mean NO ONE is this unphotogenic.

Let's face it, Michelle in her natural state is a beast.

You never see a picture of Michelle that is unflattering.

They're all airbrushed and reformated to death to make them as flattering as possible.

Same thing with Sarah Palin. She never appeared in an unflattering picture that I ever saw.

Laura Bush always looked homey and cute. Always.

Hilary is consistentaly a disaster in every shot.

There seems to be some sort of contest to see who can make her look the least attractive.

Why does the media continuously do this?

What is the agenda?

Pictures (click to insert)





\| Next Page >>