Users Online Now:
1,887
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
489,379
Pageviews Today:
777,656
Threads Today:
321
Posts Today:
4,803
08:28 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Remote Viewing Team Sees Catastrophic Situation by June 1, 2013
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:ladyannie2009:MV8xOTAzMjcwXzMxODIxOTM0XzNGQ0U0QkRB] [quote:Anonymous Coward 4701453:MV8xOTAzMjcwXzMxODIxODU3X0YxNUZEN0Qx] [quote:ladyannie2009:MV8xOTAzMjcwXzMxODE2NTYxX0UxQkVGMDFE] I've only recently started reading about remote viewing, and although I've not found any solid proof that the concept works or doesn't work, it is VERY interesting. The first link OP listed (splicd.com) is interesting. I had listened to this last night. Over 2 hr interview, but worth it if you're wanting to learn more. Lady interviewing is annoying, but if you can stand her voice, has a lot of information. I noticed something strange while listening to it. At around the 1:55:00 mark, the guys voice changes. It's subtle if you're not paying attention, but I felt it was VERY telling. If you don't have time for the entire interview and only wanna listen to that part, you may wanna back it up about 5-7 mins so you know what he's talking about, but this is the jist: Lady interviewer asking him about his targets he chose for the remote viewing, then he starts explaining how the process is done. There's a point when she asks him specifically about Yellowstone, and he explains that he had mostly chosen coastal areas, and that Yellowstone was not one of his targets. He talks a cpl more minutes. Then she asks him about California and what he/his remote viewers seen in the future pertaining to California coastline. It was during the few sentences after her question that made me back up and listen to it a few more times. When he answered, his voice stammered...then a little bit of stuttering. And then he said no, he hadn't viewed California. His voice to that point had been very rhythmic, and then all of a sudden on the Cali question, it changed. Does it mean anything? Maybe yes. Maybe no. But to me....seemed like he wasn't being 100% truthful. Not lying but definitely holding information back. I've got that 'mom radar' and to me, it sorta sounded like my teenagers do when they're trying to feed me some load of hogwash. Anyone else hear that? Wld love other opinions. [/quote] Maybe California doesn't exist/destroyed by then, hence no EQ? [/quote] actually, another glp'er suggested that very idea a cpl pages back. It truly gave me chills when I read it. During the interview, the guy seemed okay with talking about all the other coastal changes, and none of it was filled with cotton candy and rainbows....talked about massive flooding, abandoned cities. People leaving their vehicles and walking together as a group (presumably) toward the same destination. So I believe you (and the other glp'er) may have a valid theory. Later when I have some down time, I may replay the audio and listen to it again while I do some other work. See if I can read any more into it. [/quote]
Original Message
Listen to 10-minute interview with Emory University professor Courtney Brown, Ph.D.
[
link to www.splicd.com
]
Read more here:
[
link to farsight.org
]
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>