Users Online Now:
GLP Poker Rooms
Donate To GLP
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Why the chemtrail HOAX is the most ridiculous conspiracy on the net.
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 23624505:MV8xOTEzNjc0XzM3OTIzMzI1X0M5MjI5QkJD] [quote:Anonymous Coward 1211465:MV8xOTEzNjc0XzM3OTIwNDE5X0ZDNDMzRDNG] [quote:Anonymous Coward 23624505:MV8xOTEzNjc0XzM3OTE5MzM5X0YxOTI3QzYy] [quote:Anonymous Coward 33059191:MV8xOTEzNjc0XzM3OTE4NDgwX0Q2NDk2Q0VE] Wouldnt it be possible to release such ingredients without the white chemtrail? Seems retarded that the big bad government would allow it to happen in such a way that could be seen and questioned by billions of people. Surely any government 'agency' who is advanced enough to pull off such amazing feats of mass weather manipulation could also have the ability to hide people from witnessing it. Why hide it when a multi Billion dollar ad campaign marketed toward the public with enough lies to get the funding they would actually need to pull off such a stunt. Why would the government, with their undeniable ability to carry out operations we never see, and their ability To pretty much make a fucking tank invisible, choose to allow chemtrails to be identified? Te government would have no financial gain in hiding it. Only a blind conspiracist would use evidence alone as a proof to the action. If a murderer is on trial and all the evidence points to them, the question remains Why? Sure you can prove how someone may have done something but can never answer WHY. Motive, reason, etc. [/quote] It's called hiding in plain sight. People don't even look up, they plod along like a bunch of sightless idiots, let's face it. This should settle it once and for all, from the weather channel awhile back, she is qualified to speak on this I think?? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Psz0XuyGMVA SO there's your proof, keep debunking though LOL...what a joke to deny what's been admitted all over the place. [/quote] No, it's called chemtard paranoid assumption. And just because someone discusses proposals about "geoengineering", doesn't mean "they" are doing it...and it CERTAINLY doesn't prove the trails have anything to do with it...and aren't just contrails. Sorry. What you believe is an admission is nothing of the sort. [/quote] If you say so. I suppose YOU have the credentials to know more than she does? OK. I honestly hope YOU are right, believe me! You should be sorry, that you can deny away, while saying absolutely NOTHING constructive at all. I can say the same back, how DOESN'T it prove it? You have to do better than just calling whoever doesn't agree with you, a "chemtard" ...doesn't make it so, doesn't prove it as YOU'D say? There's even patents for this stuff. http://www.chemtrails911.com/docs/patents.html Wait, let me guess your next reply..."How do you know this is a real patent, no proof of it" and "That's not proof they're talking about the trails you see in the air." Am I close, predictable...now come up with another. [/quote]
It's quite simple really if you have any grasp of the physics involved.
What YOU people call classic "chemtrails"?
That go on for miles and miles and miles?
Use YOUR friggen brain.
An aircraft CAN NOT CARRY anywhere near the amount of material needed to make trails the sizes you claim.
What is happening is that moisture ALREADY IN THE air is changing state and becomes visible.
Ever watch one of the large C-130 fire fighting aircraft?
Specially made to carry large loads and fly short distances.
When it dumps it's load how much area does it cover? Half a mile?
You've been duped by hoaxters.
Trying to cling to such idiotic claims just shows how ignorant you are of aviation and physics.
Sorry to be so blunt but that's the way it is.
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
Ferguson ‘Witness 41’ Comes Forward: Says She Taped Michael Brown Shooting On Her Cell Phone
The Fascist Monopoly on Electricity
The Chinese government is building affordable housing in Brooklyn
New Study: Hepatitis B Vaccination in France Sparked a Wave of New Cases of Multiple Sclerosis
Rouble collapse prompts Moscow shopping spree
Hedge Fund Manager Who Remembers 1998 Rout Says Prepare for Pain
Police union boss flips out over cartoon showing kids telling Santa, "Keep us safe from the police"
13,500,000 Millennials Live in Poverty.
46,000,000 Americans on Food Stamps.
65 Percent of Children Live in Households on Federal Aid Programs
Sony Hackers Threaten 9/11 Attack on Movie Theaters That Screen ‘The Interview’
Why Are Atheists Investing So Much Money on Billboards Fighting a God They Don’t Think Exists?
These American Generals Are Taking a Public Stand Against Barack H. Obama
Is Your Church Secretly Indoctrinating You To Accept Chrislam?
‘Lucius II The Prophecy’ Video Game Lets You Be The Antichrist
State Orders All-Natural Creamery To Inject This In Its Milk
Video: Border Patrol Agent Claims FEMA Expects ‘200 Million Deaths’
ALERT: Secret Service experts worry about Obama’s safety; now fearing a repeat of JFK
How long can Ebola live?
Research finds copyright confusion has 'chilling effects' in online creative publishing
Attitudes to climate change depend on people's sense of belonging to the planet
Climate change could leave cities more in the dark
Crashing crude may blow a $1.6 trillion hole in the global oil sector, annually
Some experts Warn of bonds funds Crashing in 2015
Five reasons why you’re totally crazy if you aren’t growing your own food
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd.
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2014 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.005s (6 queries)