Users Online Now:
GLP Poker Rooms
GiveMeGossip.com - Gossip Forum
Donate To GLP
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Why the chemtrail HOAX is the most ridiculous conspiracy on the net.
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 46787537:MV8xOTEzNjc0XzQwODgyNDI2X0EzNTY0Nzc1] [quote:Anonymous Coward 2039156:MV8xOTEzNjc0XzM4MDM4NTcyXzE1OUEwOTc4] [quote:Anonymous Coward 18717299:MV8xOTEzNjc0XzMyMDExNTg4X0QxNkZCRjBE] [quote:G. House:MV8xOTEzNjc0XzMyMDExNDcwXzU5RUU0MUM3] [quote:Anonymous Coward 18717299:MV8xOTEzNjc0XzMyMDExMzg3XzQ1NURERTJF] [quote:G. House:MV8xOTEzNjc0XzMyMDExMzI5XzU4MEExQkEz] [quote:Anonymous Coward 18717299:MV8xOTEzNjc0XzMyMDExMjAwXzEyMjJBQkIy] That's all good OP but what about the trails at altitudes of 10,000 feet or less? Not cold enough there to make ice crystals. Plus contrails don't start and stop abruptly and hang in the sky for hours and hours spreading out for miles. Your ignorance of technology should embarass you. I personally have witnessed jets at very low altitudes, 6000 feet, spraying an obvious chemical trail, then abruptly turn that mechanism off. Also i know two commercial airline pilots whom I've asked about this phenomenon. One refused to talk about it and the other said 'i don't know what THEY are doing'. One flies for SW and the other for United. And the University of Arizona chartered a plane, went up and took air samples inside of a contrail, and measured aluminum and barium particles that don't just magically exist in our atmosphere. Their work is thoroughly documented. So i guess you can gag on my peter whenever you are ready. [/quote] [quote:Anonymous Coward 18717299:MV8xOTEzNjc0XzMyMDExMjAwXzEyMjJBQkIy] That's all good OP but what about the trails at altitudes of 10,000 feet or less? Not cold enough there to make ice crystals. Plus contrails don't start and stop abruptly and hang in the sky for hours and hours spreading out for miles. Your ignorance of technology should embarass you. I personally have witnessed jets at very low altitudes, 6000 feet, spraying an obvious chemical trail, then abruptly turn that mechanism off. Also i know two commercial airline pilots whom I've asked about this phenomenon. One refused to talk about it and the other said 'i don't know what THEY are doing'. One flies for SW and the other for United. And the University of Arizona chartered a plane, went up and took air samples inside of a contrail, and measured aluminum and barium particles that don't just magically exist in our atmosphere. Their work is thoroughly documented. So i guess you can gag on my peter whenever you are ready. [/quote] Yeah ... chemtards go on and on and on about under 10,000 feet. I've NEVER seen any. Chemtards are KNOWN for being really bad at judging altitude. [/quote] Don't be so presumptuous. i get paid big money for my expertise in spatial time speed judgement. The industry i work in is closely related to the aeronautical industry. I live near an international airport. I know the approach lanes and altitudes. And i also fly as a hobby. My judgement is sound. Besides all that the only fuel and technology changes the airlines have made since the 70's has been to clean emissions. Chemtrails did not exist in the 70's and they certainly should not exist now. OP is either a fool in denial or a paid shill. [/quote] No... YOU are obviously some sort of disinformation shill or just ignorant of the physics involved. AND... ASSHOLE! I saw my first contrail that went horizon to horizon in 1959. Contrails have been observed documented and discussed since the VERY EARLY days of high altitude flight. If YOU are not aware of this you are either IGNORANT of things aviation or again some sort of disinformation shill. [/quote] Better switch to decaf broham. This has nothing to do with contrails. Nobody denies contrails. This is about low altitude CHEMtrails that i see every day. I track chemical-spraying planes on my ARPA radar every damn day. I can plot and track their speed, heading, and altitude. Why is it that i can plot two jets at the same altitude with one having a quick dispersing contrail that evaporates while the other has a trail that lingers in the air for 8 to 12 hours and eventually spreads out to form a cloud cover that engulfs the entire visible horizon. I am not a shill. I just have common sense. I know what i see. To me it is blatantly obvious. I figure it's only a matter of time before everyone else comes to their senses. Some of you suffer from cognitive dissonance. Chemtrails are very real. Jets have been filmed spraying on approach for god sake. Sorry if you didn't research enough. [/quote] You're ignorant. The approach trails are aerodynamic. And there is no evidence that any trail has been formed outside of the correct conditions for persistent contrails, Also, learn about engine efficiency and HS power setting determines if enough vapor s released to put the air sat saturation. Looks like it's YOU who needs to do more research! Stop pretending to understand this subject. It's clear to those of us who do, that you do not. [/quote] quality shilling, :thumbs: [/quote]
It's quite simple really if you have any grasp of the physics involved.
What YOU people call classic "chemtrails"?
That go on for miles and miles and miles?
Use YOUR friggen brain.
An aircraft CAN NOT CARRY anywhere near the amount of material needed to make trails the sizes you claim.
What is happening is that moisture ALREADY IN THE air is changing state and becomes visible.
Ever watch one of the large C-130 fire fighting aircraft?
Specially made to carry large loads and fly short distances.
When it dumps it's load how much area does it cover? Half a mile?
You've been duped by hoaxters.
Trying to cling to such idiotic claims just shows how ignorant you are of aviation and physics.
Sorry to be so blunt but that's the way it is.
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
If You Question Authority, You Are Mentally Ill
Three-million-yr-old ancestor had human-like hands
Pope Pushing Depopulation Agenda of the Georgia Guidestones?
14 PEOPLE HOLD THE SECRET KEYS THAT CONTROL THE INTERNET
Fracking-induced tremors lead to changes in building codes, insurance rates
Mystery goo kills over 200 San Francisco Bay birds, officials stumped
Warning! Secret Chemtrail Operation “Indigo Skyfold” To Go Invisible This Month!
(Watch) Why Are Military Planes Dropping 50 Feet Long Metal “Raindrops” On The American People?
GLPVC TheRawFeedLive Presents La Marzulli Tue Feb 3rd at 11pm est
WHITE People Play The Race Card In A Lawsuit Never Filed By A White Person Before In History
Obama Busted in What May Be the Crime of the Century… Impeach Him NOW
Is a Death Star Coming at Us?
Laser Weapon System Is Ready For War, Less Than $1/Shot
5 Huge Government Conspiracies That Actually Happened
3 Rhinos Make A Daring Escape As Zoo Guard Sleeps
Now We Know The Plan: More Surveillance and a Patriot Act For Europe
Pentagon, DHS, Interior, Working Group on Police Militarization
From Neighborhood Cops to Robo-Cops
Ex-Googler: 'Tons Of Engineers' Want To Leave Google
Obama Blames America for Muslim Terrorism
The Muslim Brotherhood is making their move within the United States, and Barack Obama isn't doing a single thing to stop it.
Al Sharpton demanded an "emergency" meeting with Hollywood because everyone who won an Oscar happened to be white
10 things the media won’t be talking about after the Paris terror attack
The US has more jails than colleges.
Earthquakes increasing across North America, Something Bigger on the Horizon?
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd.
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2014 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.003s (3 queries)