Users Online Now:
2,050
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,599,886
Pageviews Today:
2,206,176
Threads Today:
533
Posts Today:
9,892
05:13 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
IRAN VS USA : STATS THAT MATTER
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 19099128:MV8xOTE2MjIxXzMyMDYxMjQxXzNBM0U2RDVB] USA loosers in future war against Iran. So in Iran side would whole world. Certain Persian Gulf: gulf have not deepth waters. And large NATO subamrines can not war easy in this waters. US missiles can not hit targets in coutryes what have normal AA forces. And more: for war against Iran US navy need insert into range landbase missiles. USA can not attack Iran targets from safety range. And more: modern supertankers have beam 60 meters and hull height near 30 meters (near 50 meters maximal vertical size). For block farwaters need sunk 3-4 supertankers and all shipping into and from Persian Gulf ended. Modern supertanker have 160000 grt, so not dream rise this ships during war. [/quote]
Original Message
No. of nukes - Iran: 0. USA: 8500
No. used on civilians. - Iran: 0. USA: 2
Military expenditure 2010 - Iran: $7bn. USA: $687bn
Countries attacked since 1980 - Iran: 0. USA: 16
Source : [
link to instagram.com
]
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>