Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 2,016 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 765,229
Pageviews Today: 1,405,996	Threads Today: 676	Posts Today: 11,635
03:44 PM

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject Psychos or normal - who is fittest to survive?

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

Original Message Are we all descended from psycopaths in the far distant past. In a dog eat dog world of survival, such as our ancient cave dwelling ancestors live, who would have been the ones to most successfully thrive and breed? I think the psycopaths, I don't think we would have descended from the meek - they would have been pushed aside.

Currently psychopaths make up 1% of the population - was it 100% 20,000 years ago?

If the world suffered a total catastrophe (CME, pole reversal, asteroid strike, super plague) and most of the population died off, would the percentage of psychopaths go up radically?

Who is more fit for survival in a dog eat dog (man eat man?) world - the people with no empathy or sympathy or the people with empathy and sympathy?

Pictures (click to insert)





\| Next Page >>