Users Online Now:
2,190
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,341,426
Pageviews Today:
1,921,546
Threads Today:
530
Posts Today:
10,225
03:39 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Chemtrails confirmed by Ted Gunderson (RIP)
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 20004920:MV8xOTI3OTIwXzMyMjg2NzIwXzREMjAyQzFD] There is a program by Rockefeller and his NWO-fellowers for reducement of the global population by some billions(!). These gays think on a global scale for decades. Chemtrailing is one part of this agenda. Several effects are avieved: - weakening the vitamin D production of humans throug reducement of natural sunlight. - poisoning the ground for disturbing the plants abilit to grow. - poisoning the humans for weakening the immune system and vaccaine the ppl with nano-particles and heavy metals - creating (influenca) deseases within the population - creation of a 'stratospheric shild' that can be electromagnetical influenced by Tesla technology. the creation of earthquakes and the manipulation of human brain activity is archieved. ---------------------------------------------------------- 29:50 min, History Channel explains Chemtrail technologie [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24HAexqh-Y0[/youtube] ---------------------------------------------------------- pay attention to that paper from BMBF (German Ministry of Education and Research) http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.fona.de/mediathek/pdf/Climate_Engineering_engl.pdf&sa=U&ei=Jj4EUIjlAePE0QXq5pm4Bw&ved=0CBIQFjAA&usg=AFQjCNHQaqD6l1FOXM10_0j9hOTILf2EXg go to 3.2.2, read!! 3.2.2 Aerosols in the stratosphere In principle, adding reflective sub-micrometer aerosols to the stratosphere is a good method for reducing SW solar radiation because these aerosols are inexpensive and can have a significant effect on SW radiation (Budyko 1982). In addition, stratospheric aerosols have a relatively long lifespan of 1 – 2 years (primarily due to the lack of rainfall) when compared to those in the troposphere which have a lifespan of lesser than 1 week. The effectiveness of these aerosols has already been confirmed from observing “natural experiments” in which major volcanic eruptions caused 1° of global cooling by adding 1 million tons of sulfur (asSO2) to the stratosphere, where it was converted into an aerosol (Lacis and Mishchenko 1995). This CE technology, which has been the subject of a relatively long-standing debate (Budyko 1982; Dickinson 1996; Teller et al. 1997; Keith 2000), became especially popular owing to the work of Paul Crutzen (2006) (Wigley 2006; Rasch et al. 2008b). The method has considerable potential (a reduction of many W/m2) and is in principle effective enough to offset a multiplication of the pre-industrial CO2 concentration. Modeling studies have supported the effectiveness of the basic method and discussed it’s possible side-effects (Govindasamy et al. 2003; Rasch et al. 2008a; Murphy 2009; Lenton and Vaughan 2009; Heckendorn et al. 2009; Jones et al. 2010). However, as Heckendorn et al. (2009) and Pierce et al. (2010) show the method’s effectiveness does not increase in proportion to the amount of sulfur that is added to the stratosphere. The initial estimates of amount of sulfur that is required have already been revised upwards (Katz 2010) and the expected stratospheric lifetime of the aerosols revised downwards (Tuck et al. 2008). Although, Pierce et al. (2010) suggest avoiding these difficulties and the undesirable warming of the lower stratosphere by directly deploying a sulfuric acid aerosol over a large area. Unfortunately, the technical challenges of getting large amounts of either sulfur or sulfuric acid to a height of 20 – 25 km are considerable. [b]There have been many proposals regarding the technological implementation of a [color=red]stratospheric aerosol shield[/color]. One patent filed in 1991 addresses the insertion of aerosols into the stratosphere (Chang 1991). A more recent patent is for a method that uses commercial aircraft to deploy reflective aerosols by adding a special additive to their fuel (Hucko 2009). [/b]The Microsoftfunded company Intellectual Ventures has promoted the development of a method called a “stratoshield”, which uses a balloon to carry a tube from the ground to the stratosphere to deliver the aerosols, or aerosol generating chemicals, by pumping them through the tube. Keith (2010) has also proposed to use photophoretic forces to increase the concentration and lifespan of certain reflective particles in the stratosphere and to reduce their effect on ozone chemistry. The side-effects of stratospheric aerosol injection have been debated in a number of publications. Many possible negative effects on the global hydrologic cycle have been deduced by comparing the proposed stratospheric manipulation with the largest volcanic eruption of the 20th century, Mt. Pinatubo (Hegerl and Solomon 2009). Simulations by Ricke et al. (2010) suggest that it is not possible to achieve cooling without changing precipitation patterns. However, using GCM simulations Irvine et al. (2010) more optimistically suggest that it is possible to reduce solar radiation with only minimal regional effects on precipitation. Other sideeffects also include those caused by the potentially catalytic acceleration of ozone depletion by stratospheric particles (Heckendorn et al. 2009). Adding sulfur to the stratosphere would also increase the acidity of rainfall in the vicinity of the addition. However, according to modeling studies by Kravitz et al. (2009; 2010) the global effects of acidification would be negligible. To minimize the negative side-effects of adding these aerosols Ban-Weiss and Caldeira (2010) and Eliseev et al. (2010) propose that this method can be optimized by evenly distributing the aerosols across different latitudes. However, not all side-effects are negative; one positive sideeffect is that these methods would increase diffuse solar radiation, which could have a positive effect on plant productivity (Roderick et al. 2011; Mercado et al. 2009). [/quote]
Original Message
[
link to www.youtube.com
]
Recorded on Januar, 12th 2011. Gunderson has been killed by cancer on Juli, 31th 2011.
Now we know, why noble and his fellowers are trying so hard to blame us. They are very dangerous. They really would like to see us dead. By Chemtrails, Cancer or Accident doesn't matter.
Welcome to NWO-Fascism.
Welcome to the End.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>