Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,564 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 635,245
Pageviews Today: 815,243Threads Today: 217Posts Today: 2,741
07:09 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject Another fail of the Zetas: "The Moon did not cover Jupiter last Sunday."
User Name
 
 
Font color:  Font:








In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Original Message Someone at the Poleshit.ning stumbled upon a YouTube video showing the Jupiter occultation from Wolverhampton UK on July 15, 2012.
Link to the post: [link to poleshift.ning.com]
(Scroll down about 2/3 of the page)

So this is a tricky point: If Jupiter was occulted by the Moon as calculated long ago, this would again disprove the "Earth wobble" and that Moon, Sun or planets are out of place.


Nancy Lieder:
A video was recently uploaded to the internet, shot by a camera, undescribed. Apparently depicting
an object in the vicinity of the Moon, or at least at a similar declination etc as the Moon north pole:
[link to www.youtube.com] Wolverhampton UK on July 15, 2012.
Would the Zetas please give their unique insight on this?


The video in question:


The official answer from the Zetas is not only extremly funny, the answer shows one more, that the Zetas have no clue of astronomy and are apparently the dumbest aliens in the universe:
(Please note, that this is the "official Zeta Talk" - not Nancy Talk, the excuse Nancy Lieder used for their last fail.)

SOZT
On can see upon close examination of the video that the orb in question is not solid, but light. The solid Moon retains its appearance when the camera jiggles, where the orb has a delayed reaction to being moved, appearing smeared. Camera lens record the light over a period of time, and thus when the camera is being moved an object can appear in more than one place on the lens. When some objects move, and others remain solid, this indicates they have a different SOURCE. The jiggling of the camera is intended to imply a nervous photographer, a hand held device, and thus imply legitimacy. Could the Moon be filmed from behind glass? This is not evident from the video, but this is the case, with a light laser pointed at the where the tip of the Moon crescent would appear. The distance between the cam and the Moon, and the cam and the window, differ. Thus in a zoom, there is an adjustment to one, but not the other.
This is a fraud.
EOZT



Pictures of the July 15, 2012 occultation: [link to www.google.de]

Videos of the July 15, 2012 occultation: [link to www.youtube.com]


So the Zetas tell us, that thousands of astronomers photographed and filmed the Jupiter occultation through a window, pointing a laser at the tip of the crescent Moon?

The Zetas miserably failed here.
How can the Zeta- and Nancy-believers be sure, that the Zetas didn't fail before - that the "Earth in the Cup", "Earth halted in Orbit" etc is not absolute crap?


One of the nicest videos:




Please note:
The entry and exit points of Jupiter were dependent on the location of the observer.
In UK e.g. Jupiter just touched the upper part of the Moon, in Italy it went almost central and in Egypt it was at the lower part of the Moon.



Edit:
Added the link to the Poleshit.ning post:
[link to poleshift.ning.com]



.
Pictures (click to insert)
5ahidingiamwithranttomatowtf
bsflagIdol1hfbumpyodayeahsure
banana2burnitafros226rockonredface
pigchefabductwhateverpeacecool2tounge
 | Next Page >>





GLP