Users Online Now:
1,784
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,479,705
Pageviews Today:
2,454,917
Threads Today:
921
Posts Today:
16,697
11:42 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
It's Happening Again! Harrisonburg is Hazmat Level Radiation! Bakersfield similar to Harrisonburg now!
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:WindyMind:MV8xOTUwMjg2XzMzMDY0NDMzX0I3NkYwRUJF] [quote:Black Knight:MV8xOTUwMjg2XzMzMDY0MjgzXzUwMTZBQkM3] [quote:WindyMind:MV8xOTUwMjg2XzMzMDU1NDc4X0JCQ0QwRjg3] [quote:ehecatl:MV8xOTUwMjg2XzMyODAwNzYwXzFCNTFGRTM2] [quote:WindyMind:MV8xOTUwMjg2XzMyNzk5OTUyXzU1QTI3RUZE] I suppose it is possible that the radiation network is telling the truth and the EPA is just trying to scare the hell out of everybody. [/quote] Even if their information is correct, Radiation Network is based on a totally incorrect method of measuring risk. Radiation Network simply measures radiation levels, whereas the EPA has HEPA filters to filter fallout material from the air. I am not sure but the EPA might take this reading from air filters into account in their beta readings. What Fukushima and other reactors are releasing is NOT radiation. What they are releasing are [i]radioactive isotopes[/i]. Radiation is light or just like light. It is here at its moment, and then it is gone, it no longer exists. Radioactive isotopes on the other hand emit radiation, usually for very long periods of time, and if they are ingested into the body they can damage local cell tissue and seed cancers. At the following link, if you scroll down to the first image and accompanying text about 2/3rds down the page you will see the images of the range of effect of a microscopic particle of plutonium in lung tissue. http://www.nuclearcrimes.org/2-1.php Particles like this of plutonium will probably not even register a change on a simple environmental reading of radiation on a Geiger counter, until the level of contamination is way beyond safe levels. A common Geiger counter wont even register the radiation from a speck of of alpha emitters like Uranium, or Plutonium, or Thorium until it is a very short distance, like an inch away, and the air could be full of these materials and hardly register an extra cpm click on the Geiger counter. That is why these releases of radioactive isotopes are generally of little risk as long as they remain outside of the body, but if little pollen sized specks are ingested into the body they pose a serious long term cancer risk. I believe that the EPA at least started as an organization that was truly interested in the health of the public, and many employees of the EPA still might feel that way. That was probably the culture that their testing procedures, of testing air filters, developed from. However with rising man-made radioisotopes in the environment, which seemingly nobody can prevent, not even the politicians [i](or so they think)[/i], then there are probably political forces which would want to either prevent the EPA from testing correctly, or hide their data from the public. In these modern times the testing procedure of Radiation Network is mostly irrelevant and does not for the most part reveal risk of radio-isotopes, and if it does then the health risk is already far higher than small changes in background radiation may reveal. Background radiation is not that big of a deal to some extent, people can tolerate quite a lot to some extent, as measured on a geiger counter. Besides, such a so called citizen network could have been founded and run by any organization with any interest in mind, for all we know, but their very premise of how to test is patently deceptive concerning the nature risks that people face. [/quote] I got to it finally. I[b]t would basically change everything. What is that something? Steward Udall, the head lawyer for the plaintiffs in Allen, told a Congressional panel in 1981 that the government possessed a "kind of unwillingness" to admit that "radiation is dangerous."44 Radiation is dangerous. The [color=red]United States government will not admit this[/color] even though many of her citizens are dying from the radiological abuses it wreaked upon them - and this is precisely why history will repeat itself unless her citizens rise up and rectify this and other related destructive tendencies of their own government. [/b] I sort of think that any major lawsuit against the government or the military can an will be taken care of by controlling the judge or judges. [/quote] Of course they will not admit to it! It's cancer, remember we have no "cures' and only sketchy information on what causes it! But lots of "research to look into it"! There is NO BETTER WAY to kill you off, the lawyers cannot make the case! Cancer is out there, deal with it! They will NEVER give the lawyeras access to cancer suits! Look at asbestos! They will not repeat THAT error! [/quote] I heard there is a judicial review board about agent orange. Something about the judges all ruling against it. Of course by now most of those people are dead. [/quote]
Original Message
[
link to blog.alexanderhiggins.com
]
SEE start up at the bottom of.page 9
Harisonburg is 600 to 750 CPMs last few days. No warnings, no evacuations, that's the way it's done.
I am going off to look at other cities.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>