Users Online Now:
GLP Poker Rooms
Donate To GLP
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:nomuse (not logged in) 2380183:MV8xOTU0OTkxXzMyODUwNDEyX0UyQzEzMkQ1] [quote:Skeptic the First:MV8xOTU0OTkxXzMyODMxNDQ2X0FGMjc5MDRD] [quote:Anonymous Coward 14143765:MV8xOTU0OTkxXzMyODE5MjA0XzlFQkMzMzU5] IF it was compartmentalized as you say, then everybody else involved designed, built and tested equipment capable of going to the Moon. So why not go? [/quote] Your logic is faulty on two counts. 1) The #1 difference between reality and fakery is that reality would have risked the lives of the celebrity "astronauts." Even if NASA had had equipment [i]theoretically [/i]capable of carrying humans to the moon and back, President Nixon (of mass-murdering Vietnam War infamy) could not take the political chance of another celebrity multi-death "accident"--it would have entirely killed the space program, on which the military-industrial-intelligence complex had come to depend. [/quote] Why were they celebrities, then? Are you saying it was not under NASA's control -- that regardless of who they put in the craft, they would instantly become a "celebrity" too dangerous to expose to risk? Why didn't this happen during the Mercury program? When did John Glenn become too well known to risk? Before or after his first flight? What went wrong for Grissom, Chaffee, and White? Were they not well enough known to be "celebrities" before the Apollo 1 fire? Was Grissom's earlier flights insufficient? Was getting picked for the first Moon landing (because this was the leading crew at the time) not enough? Or was this an honest accident, not a cover-up at all? I'd be interested to hear how you reconcile this. [quote:Skeptic the First:MV8xOTU0OTkxXzMyODMxNDQ2X0FGMjc5MDRD] 2) Compartmentalization does not mean that [i]all [/i]of the components were fit for purpose; but rather, that those working on the fit-for-purpose components would be unaware of the inadequacies of other components. The most obvious candidate for an unfit component was the Lunar Module (LM). The very idea that one might risk human lives on a contraption that had never been tested in the entirely alien environment in which it was supposed to operate is utterly ludicrous to any engineer who is not a mass murderer himself. [/quote] So your argument is that 9 groups were compartmentalized and made "parts" that worked anyhow, but 1 group of the ten was in on the hoax and made a part that wouldn't work? You are aware, I hope, that all these parts actually had to fit together, right? And by the by, you are wrong about the lack of testing. To be precise, you are lying about it; because you have had the testing program explained to you in detail before. You aren't being a skeptic here and engaging in query; you are being a debater here and trying to sway the opinions of others -- by carefully omitting facts you know might harm your case. The LM, of course, is not a "component." It is an assembly, including the AGC developed at MIT, the airframe built by Grumman, the APS built by -- I think it was Thiokol but I'd have to look it up -- and so on and so forth. Although Grumman did the final assembly, over a hundred different companies supplied elements and at least half of them had people come out and work on the final craft. There isn't a point at which yellow tape is thrown around the LM, and all the monitors connected to it, and all the documentation attached to it, and all the simulators for it, with a big sign saying "Grumman Top Secret Compartmentalized Fake LM Team Access Only, All Others Denied." [quote:Skeptic the First:MV8xOTU0OTkxXzMyODMxNDQ2X0FGMjc5MDRD] [b]The United States has [i]never [/i]landed a craft on another celestial body and returned it safely to earth[/b]--unless you count the "moon landings." Not before 1969, and not since. [b]The United States has [i]never [/i]sent a mammal beyond near-earth orbit, returned it to earth, and verified its good health[/b]--again, unless you count the "moon landings." Not before 1969, and not since. [/quote] Are you including robotic sample-return missions? Since you are so hung up on specific meanings in language, I have to ask if "United States" and "Celestial Body" are both necessary and inclusive. Do you doubt that the Soviets (as opposed to the US) DID succeed in landing on another celestial body and returning to Earth? Do you doubt, to be be specific, Luna 16? And do you doubt that the US ever sent a craft into space and returned it safely WITHOUT landing on another celestial body? I would like to plumb the exact extent of your denial. [/quote]
My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
In the video 6min 20 secs interview
General Walters dies, at 85, in the night after a French interview that was going to expose details about the first moon walk, it was scheduled for the next day he did not survive the night.
6min 20 secs into video
link to mountzion144.ning.com
Listen to what the New York Herald tribune says in the video. More
link to thebodyofjesusthenazoraion.com
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
Ferguson ‘Witness 41’ Comes Forward: Says She Taped Michael Brown Shooting On Her Cell Phone
The Fascist Monopoly on Electricity
The Chinese government is building affordable housing in Brooklyn
New Study: Hepatitis B Vaccination in France Sparked a Wave of New Cases of Multiple Sclerosis
Rouble collapse prompts Moscow shopping spree
Hedge Fund Manager Who Remembers 1998 Rout Says Prepare for Pain
Police union boss flips out over cartoon showing kids telling Santa, "Keep us safe from the police"
13,500,000 Millennials Live in Poverty.
46,000,000 Americans on Food Stamps.
65 Percent of Children Live in Households on Federal Aid Programs
Sony Hackers Threaten 9/11 Attack on Movie Theaters That Screen ‘The Interview’
Why Are Atheists Investing So Much Money on Billboards Fighting a God They Don’t Think Exists?
These American Generals Are Taking a Public Stand Against Barack H. Obama
Is Your Church Secretly Indoctrinating You To Accept Chrislam?
‘Lucius II The Prophecy’ Video Game Lets You Be The Antichrist
State Orders All-Natural Creamery To Inject This In Its Milk
Video: Border Patrol Agent Claims FEMA Expects ‘200 Million Deaths’
ALERT: Secret Service experts worry about Obama’s safety; now fearing a repeat of JFK
How long can Ebola live?
Research finds copyright confusion has 'chilling effects' in online creative publishing
Attitudes to climate change depend on people's sense of belonging to the planet
Climate change could leave cities more in the dark
Crashing crude may blow a $1.6 trillion hole in the global oil sector, annually
Some experts Warn of bonds funds Crashing in 2015
Five reasons why you’re totally crazy if you aren’t growing your own food
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd.
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2014 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.005s (5 queries)