Users Online Now:
2,231
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,761,594
Pageviews Today:
2,436,937
Threads Today:
598
Posts Today:
11,229
06:51 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
The NINth MONTH 911 QUAKE WARNING & 188 QUAKE CYCLE ALERT
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:MatrixLNIN11:MV8xOTcwMjg5XzMzMTk5NzQwX0M4NjI3NDEz] [quote:Anonymous Coward 1485413:MV8xOTcwMjg5XzMzMTcxMTc5X0U0OUE3NTQ4] [quote:Anonymous Coward 1485413:MV8xOTcwMjg5XzMzMTcxMDMxXzhGRUY1MjQ5] [quote:MatrixLNIN11:MV8xOTcwMjg5XzMzMTY2NDEzX0Y0NjlFODMy] [quote:Anonymous Coward 1485413:MV8xOTcwMjg5XzMzMTY1NzMyX0ExQUJBQjkx] [quote:Anonymous Coward 1485413:MV8xOTcwMjg5XzMzMTY1MDAxXzE2QzBCRjZE] OP - How strong must a quake be to fall on the ley-lines? I.e., what is your minimum richter scale qualifier for a quake? [/quote] I.e., what is the smallest magnitude quake that qualifies to fit on the ley-lines? [/quote] Usually the normal most minimum parameter are quakes 5.7 that are around the cut off of whats deemed the category of a LARGE Quake. But there are very RARE INSTANCES where quakes can be as low as 5.0 and still be considered SIGNIFICANT... and you can find many examples of this at USGS where they will list a 4.7 in the SIGNIFICANT list but exclude a 5.9 or in some cases I've seen them exclude a 6.3+ replaced with a 5.0. With that context said, I can now address your question further... Though a LARGE QUAKE is typically considered to be above 5.6 or 5.7 , I have moved away from counting those types of quakes except in rare cases when it might happen in a location that rarely has quakes, and a perfect example is the quake last august 23rd in VIRGINIA ... while it was only a 5.8, it was large enough to do damage due to its depth and location. [/quote] Thanks for the answer. I believe this to be intriguing, but I would like to know the nature if this cycle. How are you counting 188, and why? If there are dozens of quakes that fit the parameters, then there would be many other ranges in between quakes, not just 188. I have looked into this before with an open mind, and did not see a reason to apply 188, when I could apply other values for ranges, and even see what appears to be a pattern. I'm genuinely interested in this if you can provide data that shows 188 has more weight than any other number. [/quote] So the quakes I focus on then, are closer to minimum 6.0 in counting for hits on the ley lines. However, my standard for quakes that would validate a prediction, the standard mag is closer to a minimum 6.5+. As for the 188 cycle... the parameter for quakes that qualify as a validation, is narrowed down to those 7+ absolute minimum which would again also depend on LOCATION and DEPTH since a 7 MAG under a major metropolitan city would probably do serious damage versus it hitting a remote location. The only other issue i haven't discussed here yet has to do with the other classifications of LARGE versus MAJOR or MEGA and GREAT. hope that helps or addresses your question. lNIN Ok, but what do you do with quakes above 7 that are not on the 188 cycle? Since 2010, there have been nearly 30 7+. What do you do with them? [/quote] I think you're missing the significance and context of this anomaly and stats in a broader picture let alone the fact that most of the TYPES of quakes that generally correlate to this cycle, have been extremely unique and unusually powerful... that cannot be denied. the 188 cycle occurs no more than 2 times a year and the context of what you're saying suggests that all 7 mags are the same which they are not. furthermore, when you realize the cycle only happens twice a year, the only way to truly understand or see the significance of it, is to analyze it not only in totality over a larger cross-secton of TIME, but you also have to take into account the FACT that the Quakes that correlate, have in upwards of 80 to 90% of the cases, hit EXACT dates within a +/- 1 to 3 day window of it let alone the past 5 TIMES IN A ROW. For MAJOR QUAKES especially those that fall into a category of MEGA quakes (that DO NOT HAPPEN all the time as most try to claim) to hit a precise pattern over and over, is compelling evidence that this "cycle" is not the random type of coincidence skeptics would like people to believe. once you analyze the stats, you can see that 7+ quakes happen on average in general, MAYBE 1-2 times a month (even though that average and my point is validated with the recent LULL in such quakes since april). The odds of a cycle that only happens 2 times a year having such quakes that are usually far more powerful than the average 7 mag, hit within a 1-3 day window 5 TIMES IN A ROW, is again, compelling evidence supporting my argument and validating this cycle to be far beyond coincidence. If you still think its no big deal and this cycle's credence is based on playing known predictable statistics etc, then lets see you or those claiming this, pick 2 dates out of 365 days to have a MAJOR 7+ where at least 1 of those quakes is a GREAT QUAKE or 8+ hit within 3 days of the date, and DO IT 5 TIMES IN A ROW as well as showing how the dates or cycle you choose, can be correlated back at least 200 years and have an accuracy hit ratio of at least 70% to 80%. Thats the kind of context one must factor in before dismissing this using the argument about statistics and other 7 mags not on the 188 cycle. hopefully that addresses your question a bit more. [/quote]
Original Message
The infamous month of
NIN
's &
11
's approaches with yet another
188
Cycle
that will be extremely dangerous.
On 8/23 I issued 4 Large to Major Quake Windows & Dates for SEPTEMBER which also includes the upcoming
188 "
Cycle
" as well...
here's the first 2
KEY
Dates people need to be aware of and on high alert for (
complete warning in links below
):
9
/
1
/
1
2
9
/
11
/
1
2
+/- 1 day
Minimum 6.6+ Likely 7.0+ Possible 8+
All Quakes to hit within 100-200 miles of the 188 Ley-Line Grid
HeadS Up for the prophecy of
9
/
02
&
11
69
11
Will there be ANOTHER kind of event around these DATE
S
as well? ;)
Thread: MAJOR TIME WAVE ZERO DROP IN SEPTEMBER. 188 CYCLE Warm-up?
:september twz:
now that can't be good Imho...
just sayin ;/
Time for observers to get off the fence, get involved and raise awareness to help people prepare for the beginning of a major seismic uptick that will be far more dangerous in October and November, let alone the danger coming with the attack on Iran.
Thread: TWZ & MAJOR 7.4 QUAKE HITS EL SALVADOR ON EXACT DATE OF QUAKE WARNING WINDOW / 5.1 Southern CALI /6.6 MOLUCCA -ALL ON 188 LEY-LINES!
Thread: TIME WAVE ZERO CONNECTED TO 7.4 QUAKE AUGUST 26TH?!?! Wow
Thread: 40 to 60 DAYS WARNING - INTERNET, CELL PHONES & ALL GLOBAL COMMUNICATION UNDER THREAT of GOING DOWN??? ASTEROID INBOUND?? Yikes
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>