Users Online Now:
GLP Poker Rooms
Donate To GLP
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
FBI developing a TATTOO Database
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 22623897:MV8xOTcyNDg1XzMzMTI2NjU2XzgzMzY1QjMy] THis thread is dumb. Really dumb. ATF, CIA, local police, even the CDC have tattoo databases. States were catagorizing tattoos back in the 50's. The FBI has a GANG UNIT. NYPD has a gang unit and that's the lowest form. How dumb can you be to say the FBI is JUST now starting a tattoo database. If you are arrested, no matter for what reason, If you have a tattoo you will be asked to show it so they can take pictures of it and add it to the national database. [/quote]
those alphabet boys sure are busy keeping us safe!
"The FBI wants your tattoos — more specifically, the meanings behind their inky black lines and colorful shapes — and it's asking local law enforcement agencies for help.
The FBI's Biometric Center of Excellence, which already collects tattoos and other identity markers in its massive database, sent a request July 13 to police agencies for information "related to any current databases containing tattoo/symbol images, their possible meanings, gang affiliations, terrorist groups or other criminal organizations."
check the link for more info and some awesome tattoo pics:
link to www.tennesseesonsofliberty.com
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd. Godlike™
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.005s (5 queries)