Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,518 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 553,357
Pageviews Today: 721,580Threads Today: 213Posts Today: 2,925
06:22 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject Gene Kranz's Foreknowledge of Apollo 13 Mission Scenario Proves Apollo Inauthenticity
User Name
 
 
Font color:  Font:








In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Original Message Take a look and a careful LISTEN to this now "infamous" film, HOUSTON WE HAVE A PROBLEM;

[link to www.youtube.com]

6 minutes and 45 seconds into the film, one hears what I like to refer to as the famous "GENE KRANZ RA RA RA APOLLO 13 SPEECH". In his pep talk to the Apollo flight officers, Kranz reminds the Mission Control crew that they need to focus, and not to worry too much, as they have the LM to rely on if things go bad. "We still have the LM" Gene says. Well what is wrong with that?


PLENTY!

This speech is delivered only 15 minutes from the time of the alleged O2 tank explosion. Only problem is, no reason to believe anything had blown up at that time, so early on.

At said juncture, EECOM Sy Liebergot and the MOCR crew are still struggling with the question as to whether or not the difficulties are even primarily hardware based to begin with. The astronauts have heard a bang on board, Lovell, at 14 minutes from the time of the drama's inception, one minute prior to Kranz's RA RA RA SPEECH, has noted something gaseous venting, but to be sure, no one knows what is going on. Is that something hydrogen? Oxygen? Nitrogen? Water? Helium? All gases in the service module. The oxygen pressure read low, but per EECOM Sy Liebergot himself, the low readings may have been related to instrumentation problems, not a genuine O2 leak, or any major hardware glitch for that matter.

A meteor hit was one concern in terms of a hardware problem, and that meteor may have HIT THE LM. How does anyone know 15 minutes in, assuming the problem was hardware based, as to whether or not the LM itself is OK? It may have been holed by a meteor, or may have sustained some other damage.

It is not until significantly later that the team working on all this does indeed determine that this is a hardware problem, and that the ship is bleeding O2, and with it, its fuel/energy in the form of O2 which combines with H2 to generate the fuel cell's power/energy.(Technically speaking here, one would view the H2 as the "fuel", just as one views the gas in one's automobile tank as the fuel, which when combined with O2, yields heat/energy. In the case of a fuel cell, water is the poduct of the 2 chemicals which combine. With our cars, CO2 and water.)

Kranz BOTCHED IT, tipped his hand prematurely, began speaking of LM as lifeboat, before anyone even knew there was a major mechanical problem to be dealt with, and as such, Kranz betrays himself as AN A NUMBER ONE APOLLO FRAUD PERP. He is telling us all that he has FOREKNOWLEDGE of what is about to transpire.

So what went wrong?

Lovell's announcing that he witnessed a gaseous substance venting was supposed to induce the Liebergot and MOCR team to BITE on an O2 leak as a "solution", a diagnosis. But they appropriately did not bite. As mentioned, the gaseous substance could have been N2, O2, Helium, H2, H20. And, even if a gas was leaking, whatever gas that may have been, it did not necessarily mean the ship was dying. Whatever banged could have caused an instrumentation problem, and caused primarily misreadings of the data, and indeed, that is what the EECOM initially thought. BUT !!!, Kranz had been so well drilled on this, that he was to deliver this speech just after the Lovell announcement of the gas venting, as they had assumed the flight officers were going to jump to the O2 leak conclusion, that he rolled right along and BEGAN SPEAKING OF USING THE LM AS A LIFEBOAT PREMATURELY, OUT OF CONTEXT. There was no reason to think of using the LM then. The CM may well have been OK for the most part. Or were the thing a real mission, they would have had every reason to suspect that the LM may have been damaged.

Kranz WAS NOT LOGICALLY ENTITLED TO SPEAK OF USING THE LM AS A LIFEBOAT HERE, WAY TOO EARLY IN THE SCENARIO. As such, we identify the once upon a bogus official story most famous of flight directors as he is now known, as one of the MOST INFAMOUS PERPS.


EDIT; fixed link

added quotes
Pictures (click to insert)
5ahidingiamwithranttomatowtf
bsflagIdol1hfbumpyodayeahsure
banana2burnitafros226rockonredface
pigchefabductwhateverpeacecool2tounge
 | Next Page >>





GLP