Users Online Now:
GLP Poker Rooms
Donate To GLP
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
The vaccine empire has collapsed
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 25298957:MV8yMDEyNjcxXzMzODI3OTIyXzhFQTU1QTc0] [quote:Reality420 23400173:MV8yMDEyNjcxXzMzODI0ODkyXzdFMjY0NjY2] [quote:LittleMissDictator:MV8yMDEyNjcxXzRGOUYwQUIz] (NaturalNews) You may not have heard the explosion, but it happened. A review from The Cochrane Collaboration, a widely respected research-analysis team, went over all the evidence, and entered its conclusion: In healthy adults, no flu vaccine delivers protection from the flu. Boom! It doesn't protect against transmission of flu viruses from person to person, either. Boom! http://www.naturalnews.com/037471_vaccines_mythology_fairy_tale.html [/quote] Quoting from "The Death Ranger"'s site is equivalent to citing whale.to. Rational people break out in hysterics. This particular piece of anti-vaccine lying propaganda is by that kOOk, Jon Rappoport, whose wife is... a nutritionist and a naturopath and studied iridology and has a clinic where she sells her nostrums. Think they may be hard-core kOOky alt-med nutters? Let's look at that paper he's lying about, shall we? http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD001269.pub4/abstract Jonny-baby says, "In healthy adults, [b]no flu vaccine delivers protection from the flu.[/b]" but the paper he's citing says: "4% of unvaccinated people versus 1% of vaccinated people developed influenza symptoms" when the vaccine was a good match for the circulating flu. That means vaccinated people developed flu 25% as often as unvaccinated under these conditions. -or- Unvaccinated people developed flu 4 times as often as vaccinated people under these conditions. and: "poor vaccine matching were 2% and 1%", which means that unvaccinated people were 2 times as likely to develop flu than vaccinated people even when the vaccine didn't match the circulating flu. Oooh, that Jon. He be lyin' and disinformin' about that Cochrane study and expecting all his little sheep readership to be too dumb to see that he's treating them like ignoramuses. It's almost like all these kOOks who write articles have absolute disdain for their readership because virtually every time they lie about what the science says. They must figure their readership is too dumb to catch them. In any event, we can now throw anything written by Jon Rappoport into the trash since he's now shown he has no problem of bald-faced lying about what his sources say. He can join Merdola and Adams in the dumpster with the fish heads. R. [/quote] Well then, Slappy, if you know so fucking much more about the subject than everyone else, you should probably stop wasting your time posting to internet forums and go start your own website where you can enlighten everyone with your wisdom that vaccines are A-OK. [/quote]
(NaturalNews) You may not have heard the explosion, but it happened.
A review from The Cochrane Collaboration, a widely respected research-analysis team, went over all the evidence, and entered its conclusion:
In healthy adults, no flu vaccine delivers protection from the flu.
It doesn't protect against transmission of flu viruses from person to person, either.
link to www.naturalnews.com
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd. Godlike™
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.006s (5 queries)