Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 1,455 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 278,065
Pageviews Today: 437,534	Threads Today: 156	Posts Today: 2,802
04:15 AM

Back to Thread

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject The moon's crookedness is caused by our going toward the center of the galactic plane

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

[quote:Anonymous Coward 27374412:MV8yMDEzOTI1XzM0MzY3NTg2X0Y3NjNBREMy]
[quote:Menow 18943200:MV8yMDEzOTI1XzM0MzY3NTIwX0U0RUZFMDdE]
[quote:Anonymous Coward 27374412:MV8yMDEzOTI1XzM0MzY3MTYyXzY5ODRFQzg5]
[quote:Menow 18943200:MV8yMDEzOTI1XzM0MzY3MDU0X0FBMDg3MDQ4]
[quote:Anonymous Coward 27374412:MV8yMDEzOTI1XzM0MzY1MDQ2X0Y3MTRFOEFF]
[quote:Menow 18943200:MV8yMDEzOTI1XzM0MzU1NTM5XzY5ODFEQkMz]
Anybody who doesn't believe field rotation exists care to answer this question?: Do both Earth and Moon have axes and north rotational poles which point the same direction... north?
[/quote]

First, FR is a non-issue to the crux of this thread.

Second, the Moon has no Rotational pole to speak of.
[/quote]

Say what? Are you one of these "the moon does not rotate" people? That wouldn't surprise me.

[quote:Anonymous Coward 27374412:MV8yMDEzOTI1XzM0MzY1MDQ2X0Y3MTRFOEFF]
 It doesn't even have a magnetic north pole. 
[/quote]
Irrelevant. That wasn't the question.

[quote:Anonymous Coward 27374412:MV8yMDEzOTI1XzM0MzY1MDQ2X0Y3MTRFOEFF]
The most that can be said is that it has a Directional North, so that really renders the applicability of your point mute or irrelevant. 
[/quote]

First, it's "moot", not "mute" and it does no such thing. In fact, the idea of a directional north will serve just fine. I'll elaborate shortly.

[quote:Anonymous Coward 27374412:MV8yMDEzOTI1XzM0MzY1MDQ2X0Y3MTRFOEFF]
Besides, no one is saying that FR doesn't exist anyway for things like the stars in our sky. 
[/quote]

Things LIKE the stars? What is LIKE the stars, in your mind?  The planets? The milky way? The sun? The galaxies? The celestial sphere in general? The entire SKY and EVERYTHING IN IT? Of course it applies to all those things. How could it not?

[quote:Anonymous Coward 27374412:MV8yMDEzOTI1XzM0MzY1MDQ2X0Y3MTRFOEFF]
Thems three strikes, so I believe you're OUT!
[/quote]

Nice imagination. Do you always just invent whatever reality suits your mood?

To be continued.
[/quote]

It doesn't surprise me that you are of the traditional (read: brain-warshed people) academia who teaches us of Dark Matter or Quantum Physics or Gravity or the Big Ban or Relativity or Evolution (macro) or well you get the picture (maybe).

Not irrelevant.

When I spell something I spell it the way I WANT, 
[/quote]

Really? So you WANTED to say "brain-warshed" and "Big Ban"?

I digress. Let's move on to the point, if you are capable of grasping it.

[quote:Anonymous Coward 27374412:MV8yMDEzOTI1XzM0MzY3MTYyXzY5ODRFQzg5]
because it does also MUTE your point! Language is a tool, that we can use it how ever we see fit, we are NOT slaves to it, but that point escapes you, like everything else no doubt.

When two people are looking at the Moon, one from the Northern Hemisphere and one from the Southern, that's when the viewpoint changes of the Moon substantially. Libration was traditionally the only view of the Moon that changed, not because of Field rotation. Still, you're making this about FR which again is NOT, at least Kathy had the wherewithall to address the fundamental aspect of my thread with her crescent weak analysis. And Failed. But you know of her failure, so you're back with the only thing you have left, FR. And it simply does not suffice. Sorry.
[/quote]

YOU are making it about field rotation by claiming that phenomenon didn't exist until recently. That claim of yours is absurd.

So... you admit that the moon has a "north". Do you also admit that Earth has a "north" and that both of those "norths" point "north" toward the object we call the "north star"- Polaris?
[/quote]

I meant waRshed. I slipped up on Big Ban(g), but I find that was also fitting. Why keep drawing attention to certain minuscule points? Ahh

I only make a point of FR because that is the argument from the simpletons, yourself included. Why can't you grasp this easy-enough concept?

This is Not about Polaris, at least not yet, until the Big BanG hits. Can you understand?

To you: care to explain to everyone how we even have a magnetosphere? Let's put your 'knowledge' to an Easy test.
[/quote]

Original Message In our EU, the usual nearer and stronger EM forces of the sun keep us oriented--usually.

However as we approach galactic center, the forces there are so strong that we tilt even moreso sometimes (given whatever conditions we pass through at any given time), giving that mushroom smoking Cat like grin to the moon we witness, sometimes, even out of season.

Not to mention the polar disarray the sun is also going through not only with its own solar cycles (of which are bad enough), but--again--approaching galactic center.

These are signs of our impending pole shift.

Pictures (click to insert)

News