Users Online Now:
2,191
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,732,835
Pageviews Today:
2,545,696
Threads Today:
692
Posts Today:
14,391
08:47 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 1353946:MV8yMDE0MTE5XzMzODU3ODMxXzkyNEEzMDRE] [quote:UndercoverAlien:MV8yMDE0MTE5XzMzODU3ODA5X0I3QkNFQkJD] [quote:AwakenedDude:MV8yMDE0MTE5XzM3M0E2QzVF] If Zecharia Sitchin is wrong, or perhaps simply misinterpreted the "Book of Enki" tablets, can someone point me in the direction of the corrected version? I see a lot of information on the web that goes to great lengths to debunk his work, arguing about the meaning of this symbol or that symbol and whatnot. However, these same people haven't provided the "alternate/correct/updated" version of this book. Not looking for a fight or debate, although I'm sure one will break out (this is GLP after all). What gives? Can anyone shed light on this? If no updated version exists, what can be made of that? If a correct translation does exist, shouldn't we all be at least open to that possibility? Dude out. [/quote] Sitchin debunkers are not is worried whether he misinterpreted things like location of Sumerian cities, dates of kingdoms or dynasties timelines. The concerning of Sitchin debunkers is conveniently to discredit everything he said about giant extraterrestrial aliens colonizing Earth half million years ago. If Sitchin had never mentioned the ANUNNAKI, nobody would be concerned in "debunk" him, therefore it's obviously a biased agenda to stop people reasoning on this subject. If you Google for archeological excavations in the Middle East and Egypt you will find out that most of them were funded by the Rothschilds, so obviously the mainstream scholars follow the Zionist agenda to dumb-down the masses, and definitely Sitchin books don't fit in this agenda. [/quote] Sitchin didn't invent the Anunnaki name. It was from the Sumerian tales. What Sitchin did was spin a wild tale that has errors all along the way. And when confronted, he would get angry and defensive about it. No one questions the Anunnaki from the Sumerian legends or even the ones who appear in HP Lovecrafts ' Necronomicon '. [/quote]
Original Message
If Zecharia Sitchin is wrong, or perhaps simply misinterpreted the "Book of Enki" tablets, can someone point me in the direction of the corrected version?
I see a lot of information on the web that goes to great lengths to debunk his work, arguing about the meaning of this symbol or that symbol and whatnot. However, these same people haven't provided the "alternate/correct/updated" version of this book.
Not looking for a fight or debate, although I'm sure one will break out (this is GLP after all).
What gives?
Can anyone shed light on this? If no updated version exists, what can be made of that? If a correct translation does exist, shouldn't we all be at least open to that possibility?
Dude out.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>