Users Online Now:
1,721
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
68,542
Pageviews Today:
129,844
Threads Today:
53
Posts Today:
946
01:47 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 1353946:MV8yMDE0MTE5XzMzODU3OTY2XzcwOUIzQjlD] [quote:Anonymous Coward 21656968:MV8yMDE0MTE5XzMzODU3OTM3XzdBRUJGRjRG] [quote:Anonymous Coward 1353946:MV8yMDE0MTE5XzMzODU3OTE3XzQ4REQ5RENE] [quote:Anonymous Coward 21656968:MV8yMDE0MTE5XzMzODU3OTAwX0NGQTIzOTJG] There is much room for play between "right" OR "wrong". What if Sitchin had it Right but mankind translates his expression wrong? What if he was recieving his translation from a spiritual source and thus his right only depends upon the spiritual realm? Sitchin was right and wrong depending upon your perspective of translation of his works. [/quote] Well if he was right then he wouldn't have been defensive and difficult everytime he was questioned about it, right? [/quote] No. There is a knowing you're right but not understanding how. Very much like Prophecy. There have been a number of Prophets, or seers, that knew things, in context within their consciousness limits, and outside their personal perspectives, that delived "visions" or what ever, that were corrrect over time, but couldn't be expressed in modern day understandings between the person the prophet was and the people of his day. Does that make sense? [/quote] Then please explain to me the chances of two separate species from two different planets which are so close that DNA infusion can be compatible enough to create a hybrid race? After all, the Anunnaki created man from their DNA infused into the existing homo erectus being on Earth. How? [/quote]
Original Message
If Zecharia Sitchin is wrong, or perhaps simply misinterpreted the "Book of Enki" tablets, can someone point me in the direction of the corrected version?
I see a lot of information on the web that goes to great lengths to debunk his work, arguing about the meaning of this symbol or that symbol and whatnot. However, these same people haven't provided the "alternate/correct/updated" version of this book.
Not looking for a fight or debate, although I'm sure one will break out (this is GLP after all).
What gives?
Can anyone shed light on this? If no updated version exists, what can be made of that? If a correct translation does exist, shouldn't we all be at least open to that possibility?
Dude out.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>