|
Original Message
|
The biggest reason for the racial differences is that the human races evolved to live in different climates. Two of the three main human races evolved in the super-continent of Eurasia and one evolved in Africa. Eurasia has a temperate climate with strong seasonal variations, while Africa has a pretty stable tropical climate. White and Yellow humans thus evolved to live in the temperate zone, while Black humans evolved to live in the tropical zone.
That's why White and Yellow humans are quite similar in many ways, in spite of having evolved far apart from each other, whereas Black humans are notably different from the rest.
The interesting thing here, is that the effects of this climate adaption is clearly noticable in all animal life, not just humans! Every species from Africa is more "wild" than its Eurasian counterparts! Eurasian horses are easy to tame, but African zebras are very hard to "break". Eurasian elephants are also easy to tame, but African elephants are difficult to control. The fact is, almost all domesticated animals originated from Eurasia, while almost all African animals are hard to impossible to domesticate. Try taming a rhino or a hippo, at your own risk!
So exactly why are tropical animals so much more difficult to domesticate?
Because they evolved to live in a stable environment. A stable environment does not change, so animals living there have little use for adaptability. It is more efficient for them to have the optimum behavior for their environment encoded in their genes. Instinct trumps learning, if the problem is known beforehand and never changes.
But animals living in a more varying climate need to be more flexible about their behavior. Genetically hard-coded behavior is a disadvantage there, and the ability to adapt to whatever happens next is an edge over the competition.
In this way, the evolutionary forces shapes temperate zone animals towards being adaptive and generally capable of many things, rather than fixed and specialized for one thing alone.
As a result, all temperate zone wildlife comes with the ability to adapt to the demands of their environment, which can incidentally be exploited by humans by submitting them to a constructed environment where they serve various human purposes - they can be tamed! This process is called domestication, and it is hard to do with tropical animals that don't readily adapt to outside demands they weren't hard-coded to deal with.
Exactly the same thing applies to humans too!
Humans in the temperate zone needed to be able to adapt to environmental change, so their behavior evolved to become less and less hard-coded and more and more flexible. And then the miracle happened - they started changing their own environment and thus became able to decide what they should adapt to in the future! Instead of being slaves to change, these humans grew to become the masters of their own destiny.
This quantum leap in consciousness evolution eventually led to the forming of what we call civilization. What is known as domestication of animals is called civilization when it applies to ourselves. For what is civilization, if not the domestication of man?
To live in a civilization is to adapt to life in an entirely constructed environment, where almost all behavior must be learned, and almost nothing is left to instinct. The civilized man thus lives in a synthetic cage just like his domesticated animals. The only difference is, he is the designer of his own cage, and he himself holds the key to his own happiness .
There is of course a potential downside to this arrangement, the civilized man can make decisions on how his own captivity should be organized that he is not very happy to live with. But the ability to make his own destiny has arguably made him the most successful animal on Earth, and if he is a bad master of his own destiny, he has no-one to blame but himself.
The same evolutionary process leading to civilization happened both in West and East, but with an interesting difference. The White humans took a more individualist and competitive path to civilization, whereas the Yellow humans took a more collectivist and cooperative path.
Neither approach is inherently superior to the other. The competitive way has the potential to advance faster, but it is volatile and often messy. The cooperative way gives steady progress, but comes at an opportunity cost. Both work about equally well in the end, as is proved by human history. Sometimes the White humans get it right and speed past their Yellow brethren in a quick burst of development. Sometimes they drop the ball and fall back, while the Yellow humans keep their leisurely development pace and pass their noisy White brethren who are busy fighting things out between themselves for a while.
In the end it doesn't really matter. Competitive vs. cooperative is just a tradeoff between two effective adaptive strategies.
But meanwhile in Africa, the Black human never seemed to progress very far above his natural state. Civilization never happened to him. And now you understand why - he evolved to live in an unchanging environment, and just like the zebra, his behavior patterns are fixed and immutable. He lives off his instincts more than his wit, with little ability to adapt to the civilization of others, much less create one for himself. Africa evolved him that way, because it works well there. Over time, White and Yellow humans evolved into Homo Sapiens ("thinking man"), but the Black humans were unfortunately left behind.
This basic fact about humanity has always been known, but it is now strongly suppressed. It has become politically correct to claim that "we are all the same" and "race doesn't exist, it is just a social construct", and similar tosh.
Dissent is not tolerated. People who stubbornly stick to what they know in their bones are almost burned on a stake as heretics, that's how repressed this simple truth is.
And yet, nothing can change nature...
I'll illustrate this with a little anecdote about my wife. She is a teacher who teaches many classes in the new-and-improved multi-cultural Sweden, so the children she deals with daily come from all over the globe. She tries her best to educate them, but some children are extremely unruly, and it is a difficult task to keep them under control and teach at the same time.
One boy in particular causes constant commotion and tumult. He pushes and shoves the other children, starts fights, and constantly hits and kicks everyone, boys, girls, and teachers alike. Sometimes he bites. And he is all but incapable of sitting on a chair. Now he's crawling under his desk, now he's on top of it, now he's climbing a cupboard, now he's pulling out books from a bookshelf, now he's climbing the bookshelf. My wife must physically lead him back to his chair and try to get him to work on his assignment, over and over, but as soon as she turns her back on him to give a few seconds of attention to some other child, he runs amok again.
As you can understand, this makes for a highly stressful work environment. So one day, when my wife looked at this boy's seat and found him missing for the umpteenth time in ten minutes, and turned around to find him jumping vigorously up and down on the teacher's desk, she just lost it and blurted out:
"For God's sake, can't you stop acting like a monkey for five minutes!"
The whole class laughed heartily, because she had broken the spell of political correctness and said the plain truth out loud: she used the forbidden M-word on the blackest kid in the class, and everyone knew it was well deserved - he was indeed acting just like a monkey! In fact, he always acts like a monkey. Furthermore, he even looks like a monkey, with the same deeply sloping forehead and protruding jaws, even more so than most black children, almost like he is an evolutionary throwback. The truth is, in many important respects, he is more like a monkey than a human!
But somehow the politically correct Swedes still think he belongs in a class with their children, with disastrous results.
My wife bit her tongue and praised her good fortune no other adult overheard her, because stating the obvious is strictly verboten. We are all the same. Race does not exist. Race is a social construct. Anyone saying otherwise is a Nazi. Burn the heretics and the haters.
---
To end this wall-o-text, I just wish to point out that I don't "hate" anyone for their color. There's a perfect place for everyone on this planet. The only thing I hate is when the truth is being repressed, and when our civilization is being torn down by incompetent/malevolent rulers through forced immigration, the whole racket being protected by harassment of peaceful dissenters as "thought criminals", in true fascist style.
|
