Users Online Now:
Donate To GLP
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again.
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:MatrixLNIN11:MV8yMDQyODQ1XzM0NTIzMjA3X0NCNkNFMjk3] [quote:Wash:MV8yMDQyODQ1XzM0NTE5MTkyXzQwOUY4OUJD] Well done Matrix. Keep us all posted for future "events". [/quote] a MAGNITUDE 7.5+ to 8.5+ NEXT WEEK NOVEMBER 25th Target Date for this next major quake window. http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2034653/pg1 posted about that date almost 3 months ago as well mate So if you haven't seen all my videos let alone my quake warnings for ALL MAJOR quakes in 2012 and since i began posting quake warnings in 2011 thats now reached a 90% hit ratio just for MAJOR QUAKES, If you're interested and are able to understand the subject matter I present connected to Ancient Sacred Geometry with the Ley Lines of 188 I've discovered, I highly recommend checking them ALL out as I think you might find them very interesting to say the least. Now the thing is, If I lowered the magnitude to 6.0 to 6.5 as my windows ALL USED to be earlier this year, I'd have an almost 99% success rate for nearly EVERY LARGE to MAJOR quake thats occurred in 2012 not even to mention my accuracy in 2011. But since quakes 6.5 and under are more common now than ever, once you understand the stats and my warnings let alone all that I've presented in my videos, anyone that posts such warnings lower the parameter to including 6 to 6.5 quakes like that and uses that as a basis or measure to validate their work and/or predictions, is tainting their work or creating a false impression when taken in CONTEXT or totality. I think PG has some good information and I like some of his work, but I do have an issue with him claiming just "large quakes" under 6.5 add to his "portfolio" or merit of what he's claiming let alone the fact his warnings are NOT CLEARLY archived nor does he or anyone address what I've just explained especially since as I've also said, his work and predictions are based on other peoples research and information that I'm not seeing him give any credit to. But since you seem to be a supporter, I'm open to you helping me answer some of these questions or address some of my points. [/quote]
So the first time I heard Geryl talk it was in regards to Dec 21, 2012, and I thought he was out to lunch. His expectations were waaaayyy too doomish, even for an everyday GLPer.
However, since then I've been reading up on his on-going EQ perdictions associated with different planetary allignments, and holy shit has he been accurate.
This M7.4 today was the final straw for me. He called it, and once again was dead on the money of both timing and size.
link to quakes.globalincidentmap.com
Just freakin' me out a little as I live close to the ocean (very close) and we are only 43+ days until Dec 21st.
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd. Godlike™
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.004s (3 queries)