Users Online Now:
Donate To GLP
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again.
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:MatrixLNIN11:MV8yMDQyODQ1XzM0ODY0MjEzXzFEMzlBNjg=] [quote:eddieboneman:MV8yMDQyODQ1XzM0ODQxOTQ0X0EzOEJCNzNE] [quote:Pa resident1:MV8yMDQyODQ1XzM0ODE0NDQwXzUzMDA5RjM1] December 2 - 3, 2012: Conjunction Earth - Jupiter and the Sun December 3, 2012: Opposition Neptune - Mercury across the Sun December 3, 2012: Opposition Uranus - Venus across the Sun December 4-5: 7 plus :popcorn: [/quote] Is there any actual scientific evidence that supports the notion that when planets are in an 'alignment' that earthquake activity rises? Seems the 'new age' are more obssessed with these alignments than the actual ancients were. Perhaps it's more a case of alignments only really being relevant for the time. In other words, what relevance do they even play today? And why is an alignment from the earth's perspective even important? What about the alignment in relation to all the other planets and the sun? And again, where is the evidence they actually matter? [/quote] What "SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE" are you talking about? How can modern and conventional science ever be able to measure such Celestial Processes using PRIMITIVE SCIENCE? So what kind of "scientific evidence" do think can ever be presented with modern sciences LIMITED technology and knowledge? Are you saying that because "science" hasn't presented any such evidence, that it means the P.A.T. is not true or can't be true? I submit that there IS compelling EVIDENCE beyond a shadow of a doubt to support it, (and my warnings are among those that have already PROVEN it), and that science is either hiding it, denying it, or too primitive to understand it yet. What relevance do they "play" today? HUH? Are you joking? You're really unable to see the relevance and importance? Not sure what EARTH'S "perspective" has to with this issue though. and which alignment in relation to all the other planets and the sun are you talking about? perhaps the next major quake (or minimum 6.7) hitting at least 2 out of the 3 windows I've warned (or my warning for 515215 +-1day), will further validate my premise to you, especially when you realize there's a difference between coincidence and a pattern which alone is considered evidence. [/quote]
So the first time I heard Geryl talk it was in regards to Dec 21, 2012, and I thought he was out to lunch. His expectations were waaaayyy too doomish, even for an everyday GLPer.
However, since then I've been reading up on his on-going EQ perdictions associated with different planetary allignments, and holy shit has he been accurate.
This M7.4 today was the final straw for me. He called it, and once again was dead on the money of both timing and size.
link to quakes.globalincidentmap.com
Just freakin' me out a little as I live close to the ocean (very close) and we are only 43+ days until Dec 21st.
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd. Godlike™
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.005s (5 queries)