Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,974 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,083,510
Pageviews Today: 2,029,252Threads Today: 968Posts Today: 17,891
09:56 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject It was another Lord McAlpine!
User Name
 
 
Font color:  Font:








In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Original Message The boss of the BBC resigned yesterday several days after its premier current affairs program “Newsnight”, although not naming him, wrongly pointed to Lord McAlpine, close adviser to Margaret Thatcher when she was the British Prime Minister, as the sexual abuser of Steve Meesham and other children during the 1970s. When he was originally questioned by the police, Steve said that they had shown him a photo of a man whom he recognized as his abuser. He said that the police told him that it was "Lord McAlpine". Newsnight accepted his claim without checking whether it was the current Lord McAlpine before the story was broadcast. Then Steve was shown a photo of Lord McAlpine and he was horrified to realize that it was not the man who had abused him more than a dozen times as a child, and he quickly issued an apology to him. Now, some of the BBC staff are facing the sack over their sloppy journalism and the BBC is facing its biggest crisis for many years.

People have been perplexed by this retraction because it implied that the police had either misidentified the man or had deliberately given Steve the wrong name in order to discredit his claim as unreliable when the mistake eventually came exposed. The former possibility seems highly unlikely, whilst the latter took the general level of paedophile conspiracy to a new level that most people other than conspiracy theorists would find hard to believe. Others took his retraction to mean that he had been threatened to withdraw his accusation.

I now propose a more plausible explanation of what happened. There was a second Lord McAlpine – in fact, there were several. Besides the man in the middle of the current controversy -the life peer, created in 1984, Alistair McAlpine, Baron McAlpine of West Green, there was also a McAlpine baronetage:
[link to www.leighrayment.com]
Sir Thomas George Bishop McAlpine, was the 4th Baronet (1901-1983). Alistair McAlpine
[link to en.wikipedia.org]
second son of the fifth Baronet and the man misnamed by Steve Meesham, was created a life peer as Baron McAlpine of West Green in 1984. I cannot find on the internet a photo of Sir Thomas, who was the older brother of Alistair McAlpine’s father, Robert Edwin McAlpine. People on Icke’s forum are misidentifying the abuser as Robert Edwin McAlpine, Alistair McAlpine’s father,
[link to www.npg.org.uk]
who was for four years vice-president of the National Children’s Home until his death – witness this photo with his posing with Thatcher and children in connection with a missing children campaign:
[link to www.gettyimages.co.uk]
I say “misidentifying” because this is inconsistent with the fact that, when a Times reporter put Lord McAlpine’s name to Meesham in 1996, he said his abuser was in fact called “Tom”. However, it is consistent with his abuser being Sir Thomas McAlpine. However, Meesham said originally that his abuser died in the 1990s. But Sir Thomas McAlpine died in 1983, whilst Robert Edwin McAlpine died in 1990
[link to www.leighrayment.com]
Of course, Steve might be confused about the time, but the discrepancy does leave some uncertainty in the identification. However, in my opinion it does not trump the vital information that, surely, clinches the identification, namely. his remembering his abuser’s name as Tom.

Did, therefore, bloggers and journalists, hearing the name “Lord McAlpine”, automatically assume that it was Thatcher’s advisor, when it was really his uncle with the very name that Steve had heard? Steve did not make a mistake. Nor did the police. It was just the wrong Lord McAlpine.
Pictures (click to insert)
5ahidingiamwithranttomatowtf
bsflagIdol1hfbumpyodayeahsure
banana2burnitafros226rockonredface
pigchefabductwhateverpeacecool2tounge
 | Next Page >>





GLP