Users Online Now:
2,227
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,770,638
Pageviews Today:
2,449,608
Threads Today:
601
Posts Today:
11,288
06:56 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Planet X in Idaho - Poleshit-Nancy fails again
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 11443159:MV8yMDQ3NzY4XzM0NDExNzQ2XzNBMTBBQTAz] [quote:Botanator:MV8yMDQ3NzY4XzM0NDExNzAzXzJFMTY5Qjg4] [quote:Anonymous Coward 11443159:MV8yMDQ3NzY4XzM0NDExNjE3XzMxQTIwNEU3] [quote:Botanator:MV8yMDQ3NzY4XzM0NDExMzY5XzlGOTA3REND] [quote:Anonymous Coward 25108274:MV8yMDQ3NzY4XzM0NDExMjg2XzkwNkUyN0U0] Leaving at almost the Speed of light? Really? Does no one know that something that massive could NOT travel at the speed of light? You would need little to no mass to travel at the speed of light, hence why LIGHT travels at that speed. It has little to no mass. :bsflag: [/quote] I disagree. We don't know much beyond this planet. Much of Physics (which I currently study) is theories. E=MC(2) is a theory. Duality of light is a theory (light behaving like a wave and a particle). I can go on and on. What if a planet the size of Jupiter could travel the speed of light? You cannot disprove it, I cannot prove it. The only way you could attempt to prove it is to use theories which wouldn't really be proof. Though I should say, I DO NOT believe Nibiru exists. I think it's bullsh*t. I'd be able to see it with my own eyes if it did. [/quote] Pre tell just where do you study physics? [/quote] I've only just begun. I'm in College. I don't know an awful lot. I'll make my point a bit clearer, let's say we discover an element, or a particle, that defies everything we know (this could very well happen). Then we'd be sitting ducks. There's so much we don't know. PS: I'm not saying you're wrong in any way. I'm simply disagreeing. [/quote] I prophesy that your physics prof is gonna LOVE you........F F F F [/quote]
Original Message
Comment by James of Idaho
Taken this evening looking west. ... Here's a couple of pictures I would like to share.
Poleshit-Nancy's Comment:
And behind the clouds! Definitive!
And another comment by Poli, Poleshit-Nancy's German puppet master and inventor of the revolutionary zooming-cut-and-paste technology:
I think the red ring around the phenomenon is definitely behind the cloud.
An impressive picture!
:idaholfo:
And here an animation of the three photos - centered on the sun:
:idaholf:
These three photos were take within one minute.
Thus there are two options:
1) Planet X,
behind the clouds! Definitive!
, and leaving our solar system at almost the speed of light.
2) Lens flare, not behind the clouds! Definitive!, and no Planet X around.
Dear Poleshit-Members: Chose one.
.
Edit:
Link to the page (currently middle of page 1):
[
link to poleshift.ning.com
]
.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>