Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 1,267 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 313,647
Pageviews Today: 473,959	Threads Today: 212	Posts Today: 2,816
04:43 AM

Back to Thread

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject David dIcke Debunked in 19 Seconds

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

[quote:ANHEDONIC:MV8yMDQ5MjAzXzM0NTA2NDk2Xzk0MDNFMkFG]
[quote:ANHEDONIC:MV8yMDQ5MjAzXzM0NTA2MTg5XzFCNkMwQzk0]
Here are two of your posts in this thread OP:

[quote:Anonymous Coward 23254866:MV8yMDQ5MjAzXzM0NDQzNTEyXzUzNzc0M0RF]

As I explained earlier Icke fits the definition of a [b]charlatan[/b]. I think that's important enough to warn people about. In certain professions that alone would end your career but not in [b]woo woo land[/b].

Icke saying "Japan is over" is irresponsible at the very least. He has no credentials, background, or expertise to make such a judgment.

Wouldn't it be awful if his fans in Japan and the rest of the world were scared to death because they think he's a prophet and that what he says will come to pass?

I hate to see unnecessary suffering like that. How about you?[/quote]

[quote:Anonymous Coward 23254866:MV8yMDQ5MjAzXzM0NDYxODA1X0MxOUVGODQ=]
Great point. If you can debunk half of Icke's info then he's a [b]con artist, case closed.[/b]

BTW, what you said is exactly what Bullhorn Jones said about David "Icke"! This brings up another question, if Jones felt that way about Icke a while ago why does he have him on his show so often now?
 
[/quote]

So you proclaim David to be a charlatan and a con artist who operates in 'woo woo land' yet just earlier told us that you're not anti-David dIcke and that he has presented some 'unique information' that has quote 'helped you tremendously'.

Tell us then, if David is by your definition a 'con artist' and 'charlatan', how did he provide you with information that helped you tremendously??? Why would you seek to deter others from listening to his presentations if you were helped tremendously by his information? Could others not also potentially be 'helped tremendously' in the same manner that you have? Or are you a special exception to the rule?

Important question.  Which other con artists and charlatans in woo woo land have you listened to that have they also helped you tremendously? Can you recommend any others for us?

I anxiously await your clarification on this contradictory nature of your posts.  So your message is now - Don't listen to this con artist/charlatan who presented information that helped me tremendously???

This is not helping your case here OP....

:charlie:
[/quote]

:bump:
[/quote]

Original Message

Pictures (click to insert)

News