Users Online Now:
1,934
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,105,479
Pageviews Today:
2,000,432
Threads Today:
882
Posts Today:
15,394
10:35 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Mid November review
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 23703306:MV8yMDQ5NjM1XzM0NTE4MTg1XzU4OUYzMzA1] [quote:bendinglight:MV8yMDQ5NjM1XzM0NTE4MTAwX0UwMkM0RDgy] [quote:Anonymous Coward 23703306:MV8yMDQ5NjM1XzM0NTE4MDAyX0ZFMDQ2OTk=] [quote:Anonymous Coward 23703306:MV8yMDQ5NjM1XzM0NTE3OTU3XzU1NEY2RDhB] Kuril Islands 6.8 mag 48 mins ago - so now South America next? [/quote] I asked about the buoy that keeps on going but got no reply - guess now it's self-explanatory/ but if someone can explain that particular reading ? http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/obs.shtml [/quote] your answer is here http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2006376/pg1 That buoy is right where I warned more buoy activity would continue and be a precursor sign. :trianglesequence: [/quote] oh I know, just the reading looks so different; usually there's a blip and it goes back to normal, but this one just keeps on going with "tentacles" - I don't have the terminology as you can tell, and I lust for details. thanks, op, great threads! [/quote]
Original Message
Based upon previous data the longest for this to take place is within two weeks.
Personally I feel it will be by the 21st at the latest.
Guatemala down through Chile is what I'm most concerned about by far.
Somewhere between Guatemala down through Chile will have a at least one large quake next, that is for sure at very least and is the reason for this thread.
......
I know there are a lot of doom threads out there.. I'm not trying to BS people.
My record is important to me, check my others threads and what others have said and you'll know I'm not messing around.
Some of my recent track record:
By following a sequential pattern I have predicted future buoy activity and future large quakes accurately.
Such as the recent 7.5 Guatemala earthquake days before it happened:
1: The sequence shall continue:
As in step 3 location on the move with resulting pressure anywhere from Guatemala down to Chile for increased activity and 7+.
Quoting:
bendinglight
OP predicted it again!
Just about a week ago by following the plate movement sequence said
"The sequence shall continue.... As in step 3 location on the move with resulting pressure anywhere from Guatemala down to Chile for increased activity and 7+."
Now this just happened!
Thread: 7.5 quake Guatemala
The next 7+ quake since OPs post was just now in Guatemala the very starting place said had resulting pressure and there would be a 7+ earthquake!!!!
Right on again!
Quoting:
yeahsure
Yesterday at 5:40PM I replied saying this:
So, what's next??
Quoting:
einsteinsfly
"Guatemala down to Chile for increased activity and 7+"
That was my prediction on 10/30 after the Canada quake and Alaska buoy event that came true.
That's what's next..
Could even be more severe
Quoting:
bendinglight
Since then look what's happened:
"Guatemala down to Chile for increased activity and 7+"
Here is your increased activity alright!
Remember my quote was from 5:40 Eastern time.
Look what's happened since then...
4.2 Costa Rica
[
link to earthquake.usgs.gov
]
5.0 Ecuador
[
link to earthquake.usgs.gov
]
5.0 Chile
[
link to earthquake.usgs.gov
]
6.0 Chile
[
link to earthquake.usgs.gov
]
4.8 Guatemala
[
link to earthquake.usgs.gov
]
4.3 Nicaragua
[
link to earthquake.usgs.gov
]
4.8 Guatemala
[
link to earthquake.usgs.gov
]
12/3 review below
On 11/15 & 16 two large quakes hit in the black zone warning area I gave.
The 7+ for the red area never came.. however a vast increase in higher mid range quakes increased and then slowed down by the 22nd.
I counted four 6+ earthquakes, although a lot of them were eventually downgraded.
Below is a screen shot of S. America for a month of earthquakes 5.2 and larger.
Again note you'll see from the 13th though the 22 the uptick
So while there was definitely an obvious uptick and four 6ish earthquakes within a week, none reached the 7+ I pointed out.
Where does that leave me?
I use to be 100% accurate in forecasting when I had complete buoy data from the Indonesian area, now recently some buoy data has been shut down I've been doing guess work with the data I have left.
Guess work mainly based upon adjustments in the Northern Pacific, for this forecast I just buoy data off of Alaska and the 6.4 quake that occurred there a few days before the forecast.
So in a way yes, the pattern was correct as it did lead to an increase of activity in the areas pointed out but it just wasn't as strong.
I now believe next time I need to wait for larger activity in the Northern Pacific before forecasting the lower Americas.
Bare in mind the Northern Pacific was involved in all my other previous accurate predictions leading to the lower Americas but then I had complete buoy data available.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>