Users Online Now:
2,217
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,449,148
Pageviews Today:
2,416,303
Threads Today:
969
Posts Today:
17,270
10:32 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
even if the civil war was about state rights how could the south justify slavery
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 27780658:MV8yMDUxOTAyXzM0NDg1MTg2XzNCMTZEQkE0] [quote:Marxist:MV8yMDUxOTAyXzM0NDg1MTczX0NDRTQzM0U0] Because its essentially a bye-law. It would be absurd for a bye-law to operate at this level as it is largely a piece of process legislation rather than being substantive. [/quote] I would call robbing the people of the US to the tune of trillions and sending it to the Vatican is VERY substantive. [/quote]
Original Message
Okay, so with all the BS secession shit going on, it makes me question the civil war, if all these rednecks, and so-called rebels believe the civil war was about states rights (which i can see, but what state rights were being provoked by the union? anti-slavery laws or what) how could the south, being Christians and followers of Jesus, justify using slaves the way they did to achieve proficient income.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>