Users Online Now:
GLP Poker Rooms
Donate To GLP
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Is this NOT proof of chemtrails?
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 1211465:MV8yMDUyMzYzXzM0NTEwNzMzX0QxREVFNjY=] [quote:wicked props 746351:MV8yMDUyMzYzXzM0NDk5NzE5XzU5REFCMjE0] http://coto2.wordpress.com/2010/10/28/un-votes-to-ban-chemtrails/ http://www.fas.org/sgp/congress/2001/hr2977.html SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: (1) The term `space' means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space. (2)(A) The terms `weapon' and `weapons system' mean a device capable of any of the following: (i) Damaging or destroying an object (whether in outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by-- (I) firing one or more projectiles to collide with that object; (II) detonating one or more explosive devices in close proximity to that object; (III) directing a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation) against that object; or (IV) any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means. (ii) Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)-- (I) through the use of any of the means described in clause (i) or subparagraph (B); (II) through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or (III) by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person. (B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as-- (i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons; (ii) chemtrails; (iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems; (iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons; (v) laser weapons systems; (vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and (vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons. http://stopsprayingcalifornia.com/Chemtrail_Legislation.php I remember the real sky. fire fighting plane? not too many fires at 30,000+ feet look here too http://question911.com/linksall.htm Aerosol Crimes Look - up in the sky - If the information in this well researched documentary is true, we have a lot of things in this world that need to be fixed. Should give us all a lot to contemplate. [Buy the DVD] Aerosol Crimes 1of3 (WMV 47megs) Aerosol Crimes 2of3 (WMV 47megs) Aerosol Crimes 3of3 (WMV 47megs) Clouds of Death This dramatic brief film looks at the topic above with a bit more conclusion and dramatic effect. Clouds of Death (WMV 45megs) perhaps I'm insane too, or crazy or a moran too. maybe all you disinfo shills should use more fluoride. thanks for stopping by! nice chatting with you [/quote] "buy the DVD" "dramatic effect" SUCKER! How is a DVD created by OTHER chemtards any more evidence than what you chemtards spew in forums?! It's the same ignorant nonsense. The trails are contrails. There is no evidence that what you see in the sky, has anything to do with what you just posted. HR2977 was about keeping war out of space...And the trails we see have NOTHING to do with that bill! The only reason you people link this bill...to the trails, is because you are stupid and paranoid...not to mention hilariously pathetic. These are facts. Go ahead...connect dots that don't even exist. You may not know that you're paranoid...but I know you are! [/quote]
I mean at this point we're just arguing symantecs, come on people. You can even see the hatch open.
link to youtu.be
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
Double amputee moves prosthetic arms by intuitive thought
Feminism Backlash: Media Programming, Endocrine Disruptors, Will Men Find Their Hearts Again?
The Baltic Dry Index Has Never Crashed This Fast Post-Thanksgiving
Why There's No Ebola Vaccine
What is a New World Order?
How Nonprofit Hospitals Are Seizing Patients’ Wages
Cop: We Need Military Equipment Because of “Constitutionalists”
Forget North Korea: Watch Out for Chinese Censorship of Hollywood
Vermont Governor Abandons Single-Payer Healthcare
How Germany Was Partitioned. Lessons for Ukraine
EPA Declines to Classify Coal Ash as Hazardous Waste
Protesters shut down part of Mall of America in Minnesota
World War III - The Calm Before the Storm
EFF in Court to Argue NSA Data Collection from Internet Backbone Is Unconstitutional
Unacceptable Levels: The Chemicals In Our Bodies; How They Got There and What To Do About It
Satanic Temple Invokes Supreme Court Ruling to Force Display at Florida Capitol Building
US seeks to overthrow Venezuela government: official
Privacy will not exist in 10 years
Correction: Tonight isn't the longest night in Earth's history
Creep of the Week: Convicted Wall Street trader sues customer who turned him in!
Obama condemns Sony's decision to drop film, says US must retaliate and pass cyber bill
Bush v. Clinton In 2016? New World Order Dream Matchup Being Touted As ‘Inevitable’
Court Rules You CAN Be ‘Too Smart’ to Be a Cop
Mainstream Media Ignores Massive Open Carry Protest
Police Pre-Crime Algorithm Uses Social Media Posts Against You in Real-Time
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd.
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2014 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.005s (5 queries)