Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 2,419 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 681,529
Pageviews Today: 1,056,945	Threads Today: 379	Posts Today: 6,565
10:29 AM

Back to Thread

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject The earth is NOT 6000 years old.

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

[quote:Anonymous Coward 2045712:MV8yMDY2NDAzXzM0Nzg1ODk0XzM1Mzk4QkJC]
[quote:Anonymous Coward 28711488:MV8yMDY2NDAzXzM0Nzg1NzE0X0Y2QkM0NjhF]
[quote:Anonymous Coward 5164756:MV8yMDY2NDAzXzM0Nzg0OTc4XzFCNzJFNzRD]
1. Radioactive clocks tell us the world is 100% older than 4 billion years.

2. DNA from fossils shows us directly the family tree of evolution.

3. There is zero arguments to be had about this. These are not false dating methods as someone pointed out.

4. We have mapped the genome, but I'm sure that you're well aware.

who is this person who said our dating methods are incorrect. Where's your evidence? What source?

5. Creationism has zero credibility. 
There is no evidence.

6. Science has nothing but evidence.

7. There was no great flood. It's a metaphor, one that was never to be taken literally.

8. The bible does not state the age of the earth.

9. Your god has never penned anything as far as I know. 
A council of men who remembered the stories they were told did however. It was a lovely peice of fiction. And that's all it is.

10. I'm moving to England, where we actually don't allow these types to talk.
[/quote]

:sigh: Wrong about many counts:

1) radioactive dating failures are numerous when dating rock of known age resulting in an erroneous age. It is not an accurate method at all largely due to weather and erosion.

2) Genetics remain constant according to Mendel's Laws on Genetics. This was in contrast to the claims made by Lamarck and Darwin who claimed one creature would become another. DNA itself does not last longer than 10kyears. Any found would be younger than that.

3) better dating methods are the observed erosion rates.

4) the genome of what exactly?

5) true - the one with no evidence has zero credibility. Obviously there is a conspiracy.

6) Science and evolution theories are two different things.

7) Jesus spoke about the flood of Noah "taking them all away" as not metaphorically. Everyone was killed in a global flood, and all the animals giving us the resulting fossil record and sedimentary geocolumn.

8) Now you are an expert on the Bible too? The Bible specifically counts geneologies from Jesus back to Adam.

9) Prophets receive word directly from God who then came to earth that we may know him, recorded by all the historians of the day.

10) They dont allow Freedom in England? You must be mistaken.
[/quote]

Did you get those generic creationist responses from a creationist cracker?
The only one that isn't bullshit is no. 10. 
The UK does allow freedom however we don't take any notice of the likes of you and encourage you to move to Texas where you are are your natural habitat.
[/quote]

Original Message Do the Christians of this forum have an opinion on this? Its pretty controversial to confront Christian belief of creation. What about when its done by one of your own?

[link to www.huffingtonpost.com]

Pictures (click to insert)

News