Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,999 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 394,030
Pageviews Today: 626,473Threads Today: 221Posts Today: 3,134
07:51 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject WE DONT EVEN KNOW WHAT YEAR THIS IS!!! (We have been LIED TO) WHY? NOBODY KNOWS
User Name
 
 
Font color:  Font:








In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Original Message The pope said Jesus may have been born years earlier than thought. Well, if this is true, then what year could this be???
THE PHANTOM TIME CONSPIRACYThere is a conspiracy theory that has really not been talked about because many people dismiss the very idea that the greatest lie of all is where we are now in time. Orwell had written that “He controls the past controls the present and future.” However the quote goes even further, it continues to point out that all knowledge, meaning and value exists only in the collective mind of the Party; reality is the new past, the new past is what was, hence “he who controls the past controls the future, and he who controls the present controls the past“.

What if one of the biggest conspiracies is the conspiracy to “create a past” that did not exist. Time and history is literally a phantom and all we know of it, is what we have been told to us by authorities that control time and the way we view history. No one would even attempt to say that the entire era was made up or pieced together in an incongruent puzzle that cannot be trusted.

The conspiracy I am referencing is known as the Phantom time Conspiracy. It isn’t a popular one because it doesn’t involve government cover-up, what it does involve however is those shadow entities or authorities that have given us a history that really did not exist.

The Phantom Time Hypothesis suggests that the early Middle Ages (614-911 A.D.) never happened, but were added to the calendar long ago either by accident, by misinterpretation of documents, or by deliberate falsification by calendar conspirators. This would mean that all artifacts ascribed to those three centuries belong to other periods, and that all events thought to have occurred during that same period occurred at other times, or are outright fabrications.

This theory has been presented by a man named Heribert Illig. He determined that historians have admitted that there have been many documents from the Middle Ages that do not measure up to scrutiny and that these falsified accounts in history seem to be discovered more and more. These historical discrepancies were the subject of an archaeological conference that was held in Germany in 1986.

Horst Fuhrmann, the president of the Monumenta Germaniae Historica, had indicated that many of the documents produced by the Roman Catholic Church during the Middle Ages were created hundreds of years before any of the events described happened. These events were then accepted by medieval society as factual. This implied that whoever produced the forgeries must have very skillfully anticipated the future. Or there was some discrepancy in calculating dates.

Now put yourself in today’s contemporary history and notice that we also have been seeing the same thing happening with regards to potentiality and the idea of what I call retro causality as if the event happens before the cause. We have this massive déjà vu and this massive memory hole where we somehow have forgotten history only to have it replaced with other history. Take for example the death of Osama Bin laden. There is a new film coming out called Zero Dark Thirty that is supposed to reinforce the idea that Osama Bin Laden died in a raid that happened in Pakistan on May 1st, 2011.

However, it seems that the time between 9/11 attacks and the time of the announcement of his death by the Obama administration we somehow have erased from the collective memory the report of his death in 2001.

According to a CBS News report on January 28, 2002, Osama bin Laden was hospitalized for dialysis treatment in the Pakistani military hospital in Rawalpindi on September 10, 2001, the day before 9/11. It was reported that Bin laden had a terminal lung problem and kidney disease. Obviously, a man suffering from terminal lung and kidney disease did not survive for another decade to be murdered by a US Navy SEAL team in Abbottabad.

Fox News of all organizations reported that Osama Bin laden died the day after Christmas 2001. The news organization reported the headline Osama Bin laden already dead and stated that he died of a lung infection. In medieval times it seems that it took centuries to manipulate history and today it takes less time to take advantage of the collective blind spot that can be exploited.

Do we now have to wonder if there are blind spots in history that have been manipulated? Is there a phantom time conspiracy where the elite are capable of time manipulation and retro causality?

I have been suspicious of history because I am student of history and I have also been suspicious of time because of a number of reasons and in recent time I am seeing some amazing occurrences now, that indicate that soon we will have to admit that time is irrelevant, that the way we measure time will have to change and that in the future we will eventually be told that hundreds of years of history cannot be accounted for.

When think of the 300 years of lost time you have to ask why the church would have forged documents hundreds of years before they would become useful. Were they hiding something? Was there an event that happened in those 300 years that needed to be covered up?

In 1582, the Gregorian calendar we still use today was introduced by Pope Gregory XIII to replace the outdated Julian calendar which had been implemented in 45 BC. The Gregorian calendar was designed to correct for a ten-day discrepancy caused by the fact that the Julian year was 10.8 minutes too long. But by Heribert Illig’s math, the 1,627 years which had passed since the Julian calendar started should have accrued a thirteen-day discrepancy a ten-day error would have only taken 1,257 years.

So Illig and his group went hunting for other gaps in history, and found a few… for example, a gap of building in Constantinople (558 AD – 908 AD) and a gap in the doctrine of faith, especially the gap in the evolution of theory and meaning of purgatory (600 AD until ca. 1100). From all of this data, they have become convinced that at some time, the calendar year was increased by 297 years without the corresponding passage of time.

Now there are several ways to challenge this hypothesis. I would say the Bible would be great place to start however the Pope made an announcement that now put the dating of events of the bible into question. The pope now claims in a new book that Jesus was born several years earlier than commonly believed.


“The calculation of the beginning of our calendar – based on the birth of Jesus – was made by Dionysius Exiguus, who made a mistake in his calculations by several years. The actual date of Jesus’s birth was several years before.” – Pope Benedict XVI

What?

The assertion that the Christian calendar is based on a false premise is not new – many historians believe that Christ was born sometime between 7BC and 2BC. But the fact that doubts over one of the keystones of Christian tradition have been raised by the leader of the world’s one billion Catholics is striking. The timing is also amazing because of the advent that has been parleyed around about a so called Day of Judgment or change on December 21st 2012, the beginning of the winter solstice.

The Bible does not specify a date for the birth of Christ. Dionysius Exiguus or Dennis the small appears to have based his calculations on vague references to Jesus’s age at the start of his ministry and the fact that he was baptized in the reign of the emperor Tiberius.

Christ’s birth date is not the only controversy raised by the Pope in his new book – he also said that contrary to the traditional Nativity scene, there were no oxen, donkeys or other animals at Jesus’ birth.

In a sourced reference from reporter Nick Scores in Rome, John Barton, Professor of the Interpretation of the Holy Scripture at Oriel College, Oxford University, said most academics agreed with the Pope that the Christian calendar was wrong and that Jesus was born several years earlier than commonly thought, probably between 6BC and 4BC.

“There is no reference to when he was born in the Bible – all we know is that he was born in the reign of Herod the Great, who died before 1AD,” he told The Daily Telegraph. “It’s been surmised for a very long time that Jesus was born before 1AD – no one knows for sure.”


Is this another attempt at a cover up of missing time or lost calculations and fabrications? We can also use other methods to try and rule out the phantom time hypothesis.

We can determine time using astrological and astronomy charts however it seems a bit odd that in 2011 there was an attempt to even change the Zodiac. We were told that due to earth changes reported by NASA, there needed to be an added house to the Zodiac called Ophiuchus. It is the house of the dragon or the serpent holder.

The 2012 warnings from the Mayan Calendar are believe it or not linked to Dragons. The dragons are said in Mayan History to appear from the sun and from the galactic rift. According to the Mayans the end of the creation cycle happened in 2011 and the new cycle will begin in December of 2012.

It is a time where we move into an area of the Zodiac that at one time was devoted to a character that was known as the “serpent bearer” or the “serpent god”. Many others call this area of the zodiac the “dark rift.” The dark rift is in Serpentarius (Ophiuchus), the home of the serpent gods it has also been called “zero point” or the point of creation.

The ancient gods of the Maya and similar cultures were flying serpents or “dragons.” There are many who have speculated that these fiery serpents were not serpents at all but huge comets or meteors that hit the earth causing floods, climate changes, and extinction level events. Others see the dragons as metaphors for the rise of the demonic forces and spiritually wicked entities in places of power. The Dragon in the apocalypse will be confronted with an army of angels lead by Michael the archangel, In the 12th chapter of Book of Revelation we find that 1/3rd of the angels rebelled against god and the remaining 2/3rds remained with God and eventually became man.

According to the 12th chapter of the book of revelation it reads that the Dragon’s tail drew the third part of the souls of heaven, and did cast them to the earth, the remaining 2/3rds dwelled in the presence of God.

In the Old Norse Mythology the God Thor returns prior to Ragnarok, the end of the world to fight the fiery serpent Jormungand. The Serpent grows so large that he is able to surround the Earth and grasp his own tail. When he lets go, the world will end.

The symbol of the Dragon eating his tail has been known as the Ouroboros, a symbol associated with the cycles of the sun. The cycles of the sun and its passing through the dark rift is what is of concerned with astrologers.

Ophiuchus and some of the fixed stars in it were sometimes used by astrologers in antiquity as extra-zodiacal indicators in determining the times for cataclysms. It is interesting to note that the meanings of the crossing of the ‘Dark rift’, Dark Star, Black Sun, or zero point is often associated with “Judgment” or “day of Judgment.”

This has been known as sidereal astrology. The new system regardless of popularity has to be used by astrologers now because of the shift in alignment with the stars caused by axial precession.

Axial precession was first made known when it was reported by National geographic that in the year 2011 there was a major event that took place the proved that the world had wobbled and that the changes that were all part of future prophecies were fulfilled.


Time manipulation and event changing is something that can be done without anyone being aware.


Rock star Jon Bon Jovi was reported dead in 2011. The headline was a hoax created by a musician named Jeffery Goho. There were a lot of people however who believed the story as it spread virally through the blogosphere and Twitter. WBTV in Charlotte, North Carolina reported that Billy Graham had died in 2011 at the Mission Hospital in Ashville. An hour later the station corrected the mistake. Billy Graham was alive.

It was also reported that Kim Jong Il died of a heart attack. That was reported in the news December 19th, 2011. However, it was said that Kim Jong Il had been dead days before may be even weeks before the world was aware of his passing.

Italian newspapers had speculated on the death of the pope at the beginning of 2012 and when that was proven a hoax they predicted a plot to kill him. Barack Obama has been also been reportedly dead or killed in several blogs and then they have disappeared.

Prince Charles recently reported that he felt that his time is running out and that he may not see the day when he will be King of England. He recently joked that he would be snuffed out before he became ruler of England.


“Impatient? Me? What a thing to suggest! Yes of course I am. I’ll run out of time soon. I shall have snuffed it if I’m not careful.”

Meanwhile, there are other indicators that the leaders of the world are preoccupied with time running out.
[link to www.groundzeromedia.org]

*Several Paragraphs have been snipped*

Read in its entirety.
Pictures (click to insert)
5ahidingiamwithranttomatowtf
bsflagIdol1hfbumpyodayeahsure
banana2burnitafros226rockonredface
pigchefabductwhateverpeacecool2tounge
 | Next Page >>





GLP