Users Online Now:
Donate To GLP
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
USA Gun Control Timeline, a social experiment...Post Sandy Hook to Present
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:milehighmike:MV8yMDgyMDY0XzM1NTM2OTk1X0NGNkIzMDA5] [b][i][u]"Gun control debate: Is an assault weapons ban out of reach?"[/u][/i][/b] [b]http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/gun-control-debate-assault-weapons-ban-reach-094810128.html[/b] [b][i]"Vice President Joe Biden announced Thursday that he will recommend new gun control measures to President Barack Obama, which include more comprehensive background checks on gun buyers and limits on the sizes of ammunition magazines. The proposal could lead to the most significant move on guns in 20 years, but one regulation highly coveted by gun control advocates is notably missing: a ban on assault weapons. In 1994, President Bill Clinton managed to push through a sweeping ban on certain kinds of semi-automatic weapons, dealing a crushing blow to the National Rifle Association and other gun lobbyists and sparking a political backlash that helped Republicans reclaim the House and Senate for the first time in 50 years. That ban, which expired 10 years later in 2004, is still seen as the gold standard by many gun control advocates, who have been fighting in vain to get it reinstated—with some modifications—for years. Since the horrific Dec. 14 school shooting in Newtown, Conn., that left 20 first graders dead and sparked a national conversation about the nation's gun violence problem, many advocates think they see their chance. "It is time to pass an enforceable and effective assault weapons ban," New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, the leading gun control advocate in the nation, said in a press conference after the shooting. Democratic lawmakers on Capitol Hill quickly introduced legislation to ban the weapons in late December. But Biden's omission of the ban from his description of his package of proposals on Thursday suggests an assault weapons ban is out of reach. A lot has changed since 1994—including public opinion,the legal landscape and the political might of the NRA. "I don't think a ban on assault weapons—which is a ban on some of the most popular rifles in America—is likely to get support," said Adam Winkler, a UCLA law professor and Second Amendment expert. "The 1994 ban was widely recognized to be ineffective and to be riddled with loopholes."[/i][/b] [/quote]
The purpose of this thread is to chronicle the oh-so-obvious attempts by certain elements to change public opinion about the 2nd Amendment and the
to own guns.
Please feel free to add any links I've overlooked or add to this ongoing project.
Less than 24 hours after a tragedy:
"Dem. lawmaker: To get gun control, Obama must ‘exploit’ shooting"
link to www.washingtontimes.com
"Bloomberg: Obama Must Take 'Immediate Action' Against Guns"
link to www.breitbart.com
Updated: 12-20-12:"Bloomberg Vows Stiffer Fight to Overhaul U.S. Gun Laws"
link to www.nytimes.com
Updated 12-26-12: "Bloomberg Blasts NRA: 'Connecticut Is Because of Some of Their Actions'"
link to abcnews.go.com
"Rupert Murdoch Verified;@rupertmurdoch
"Terrible news today. When will politicians find courage to ban automatic weapons? As in Oz after similar tragedy."
link to twitter.com (secure)
Updated 12-22-12: "Rupert Murdoch backs Obama's gun grab"
link to www.renewamerica.com
This is copyrighted information presented under the Fair Use Doctrine of the United States Copyright Act (section 107 of title 17) which states: 'the fair use of a copyrighted work...for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.' In practice the courts have decided that anything which does not financially harm the copyright holder is fair use.
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
Obamacare Hardship Exemption Offered to Offset Hardship Caused by…Obamacare
(VIDEO) MSNBC Host Says “SANTA ‘COULD BE TRANSGENDER”
Convention of States: We Can Rein in the Federal Government
Science Focues on Body’s Own ‘Inner Light’ as the Ultimate Healer
Druids celebrate winter solstice at Stonehenge
House Introduces Bill to Prevent Military Pension Cuts
Recession in 2014: “The Government Will Not Be Able to Save the Economy”
Map: Areas Of Probable Power System Collapse: “130 Million Lacking Power For Several Years”
The truth about Education – A Truth We have to Accept
Obama Sends Openly Homosexual Delegation to Russian Olympic Games – Advances Communist Goal #26
U.S. Air Force plans to add 1,000 new cybersecurity personnel
'Green Bullets' Overtaking Lead Thanks to EPA, State Regs, Military
Autism and Vitamin D
Meteor Slams Moon, Creates 59-Foot-Wide Crater
Scientists Manufacture Biofuel from Algae in Minutes
An Inside Look at Sustainable Farming in America
Plant some flowers the macho way: from the end of a shotgun
Scientists looking closer at what happens when body dies...
First foreign-owned toll road hits Dallas!
You'll Never Guess Where This FBI Agent Left a Secret Interrogation Manual
Magic Mushrooms Repair PTSD?
OH Bill Would Require Parents to Undergo State Investigation Before Homeschooling
9/11 Families 'Ecstatic' They Can Finally Sue Saudi Arabia
Experts Fear Nuclear Famine: “A Disaster So Massive in Scale that No Preparation is Possible”
Supreme Court to make landmark ruling on prostitution
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd.
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2014 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.004s (3 queries)