Users Online Now:
1,535
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
396,800
Pageviews Today:
622,991
Threads Today:
235
Posts Today:
3,839
06:56 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
USA Gun Control Timeline, a social experiment...Post Sandy Hook to Present
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:milehighmike:MV8yMDgyMDY0XzM1NTQ1NTkxXzYxODk3RThB] [b][i][color=red]I'm SURE they do...[/color][/i][/b] [b][i][u]"Gun Control Crowd Wants To Be Called ‘Gun Safety’ Crowd"[/u][/i][/b] [b]http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/01/gun-control-gun-safety.php?tag=yhoo[/b] [b][i][color=darkred]"Anyone who’s written the words “gun control” since the push for gun violence prevention began in the wake of the Newtown shooting has received the emails. It’s not called “gun control” anymore, proponents of new and more stringent regulations on firearms write. Start calling it “gun safety.” Gun control supporters say the term “gun safety” is less, well, loaded than “gun control,” the standard name for the push by groups like the Brady Campaign and others for decades. As part of their efforts to change the gun control push to make it more palatable politically, some are suggesting the phrase “gun control” be dropped once and for all. During a brief press appearance on Thursday, Vice President Biden didn’t use the words “gun control” at all while talking about what actions the White House may push to help prevent future gun violence. But he did say “gun safety” three times in reference to groups like Brady, which favor new regulations on firearms. "[/color][/i][/b] [/quote]
Original Message
The purpose of this thread is to chronicle the oh-so-obvious attempts by certain elements to change public opinion about the 2nd Amendment and the
RIGHT
to own guns.
Please feel free to add any links I've overlooked or add to this ongoing project.
Less than 24 hours after a tragedy:
"Dem. lawmaker: To get gun control, Obama must ‘exploit’ shooting"
[
link to www.washingtontimes.com
]
"Bloomberg: Obama Must Take 'Immediate Action' Against Guns"
[
link to www.breitbart.com
]
Updated: 12-20-12:"Bloomberg Vows Stiffer Fight to Overhaul U.S. Gun Laws"
[
link to www.nytimes.com
]
Updated 12-26-12: "Bloomberg Blasts NRA: 'Connecticut Is Because of Some of Their Actions'"
[
link to abcnews.go.com
]
"Rupert Murdoch Verified;@rupertmurdoch
"Terrible news today. When will politicians find courage to ban automatic weapons? As in Oz after similar tragedy."
[
link to twitter.com (secure)
]
Updated 12-22-12: "Rupert Murdoch backs Obama's gun grab"
[
link to www.renewamerica.com
]
This is copyrighted information presented under the Fair Use Doctrine of the United States Copyright Act (section 107 of title 17) which states: 'the fair use of a copyrighted work...for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.' In practice the courts have decided that anything which does not financially harm the copyright holder is fair use.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>