Users Online Now:
1,944
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,151,949
Pageviews Today:
1,927,576
Threads Today:
777
Posts Today:
13,235
07:34 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 24854023:MV8yMDkwNzM0XzM1MTk1OTU1XzU4RDY5QkFD] [quote:Anonymous Coward 30562031:MV8yMDkwNzM0XzM1MTk1ODA4XzVBRDI3OTYz] [quote:Anonymous Coward 24854023:MV8yMDkwNzM0XzM1MTk1NjkwXzhGNTU2NzEy] [quote:Anonymous Coward 30562031:MV8yMDkwNzM0XzM1MTk1NjQxXzRERkMyOUM5] [quote:Anonymous Coward 24854023:MV8yMDkwNzM0XzM1MTk1NTQ0XzNGRDA2MzFG] [quote:Anonymous Coward 30562031:MV8yMDkwNzM0XzM1MTk1NDYwX0I0OUFGQjM=] [b][u]What the second amendment really means and why guns should be banned for citizens because it was never legal. The second amendment is a misinterpretation [/u][/b] Many people think the second amendment is [i][b] A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.[/b][/i] But all respected historians know that is an error the second amendment actually says. [b][i]A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear [color=red][b]armor[/b][/color] shall not be infringed[color=red]:[b]in times of war[/b][/color][/i] [/b] Now using the correct version you can see that the second amendment actually is intended for the people to use offense weapons and protect themselves with body armor.Instead of defensive weapons such as guns. On that merit alone,guns should be banned because they never were suppose to be legal for citizens anyway. The second amendment is a misinterpretation [u][color=darkred][b]Guns are barbaric and a vice in today's modern society and thus the provision for guns should only be made for law enforcement and government.[/b][/color][/u] [b][u]Obama should pass laws for constitutional reform so that only the government and law enforcement can only have gun.[/u][/b] It's the only safe choice [/quote] You are so full of shit you stink... even your stupid fucking post.. you just add words and thoughts willy nilly wherever you want. You fucktarded asswipe post is not what the 2nd says. read it asshole. better yet, shut the fuck up and go to your corner, there are adults trying to have a serious conversation here. [/quote] ad ignorantiam attacks won't work I'm calling you out and what I have presented is the real original second amendment and any historian can tell you that.In fact you can research it yourself.You gun holding coward [/quote] Fuckin liar. lemme add... commie. [/quote] You can research it yourself ,the second amendment actually original says: [b][i]A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear [color=red][b]armor[/b][/color] shall not be infringed[color=red]:[b]in times of war[/b][/color][/i] [/b] [/quote] Fuckin liar. lemme add... commie. [/quote]
Original Message
Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
[
link to www.thegatewaypundit.com
]
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>