Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 1,353 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 332,931
Pageviews Today: 532,913	Threads Today: 165	Posts Today: 3,130
06:52 AM

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject State trying to make sperm donor pay child support

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

[quote:samanthasunflower:MV8yMTAxMTc3XzM1NDEyMjAzXzQzMTU1N0JB]
[quote:Anonymous Coward 1310035:MV8yMTAxMTc3XzM1NDExNjkwXzFFNjJCQTdC]
[quote:samanthasunflower:MV8yMTAxMTc3XzM1NDExMjkxXzZFNkMyMjMx]
The child is genetically his and he has a responsibility to provide for that child.  I have no pity for him.  Although if money was not the issue, we all know that the court would not have granted him visitation.  They would have claimed that the child already had two parents, the lesbian idiots.

Our child support laws are downright evil.  I know someone who is genetically not the father of a child, he never adopted the child, and he was never married to the mother, but he has to pay child support.   His problem is that he was dating the mother and let her put his name down on the Birth Certificate.  Proving that he wasn't the father did no good, he still has to pay.
[/quote]

So if this was a hetero couple that needed a donor then the couple broke up would it be fair that the donor would have to pay child support or the childs father.

or are you blinede by biggotry?
[/quote]

It doesn't matter who the idiots are who he gave his sperm to, the child is his flesh and blood.
[/quote]

Original Message OPEKA, Kan. (AP) — A Kansas man who donated sperm to a lesbian couple after answering an online ad is fighting the state's efforts to suddenly force him to pay child support for the now 3-year-old girl, arguing that he and the women signed an agreement waiving all of his parental rights.

The case hinges on the fact that no doctors were used for the artificial insemination. The state argues that because William Marotta didn't work through a clinic or doctor, as required by state law, he can be held responsible for about $6,000 that the child's biological mother received through public assistance — as well as future child support.

Angela de Rocha, spokeswoman for the Kansas Department for Children and Families, said that when a single mother seeks benefits for a child, it's routine for the department to try to determine the child's paternity and require the father to make support payments to lessen the potential cost to taxpayers.

Marotta, a 46-year-old Topeka resident, answered an online ad in 2009 from a local couple, Angela Bauer and Jennifer Schreiner, who said they were seeking a sperm donor. After exchanging emails and meeting, the three signed an agreement relieving Marotta of any financial or paternal responsibility.

But instead of working with a doctor, Marotta agreed to drop off a container with his sperm at the couple's home and the women successfully handled the artificial insemination themselves. Schreiner become pregnant with a girl.

Late last year, after she and Bauer broke up, Schreiner received public assistance from the state to help care for the girl.

The Kansas Department for Children and Families filed a court petition against Marotta in October, asking that he be required to reimburse the state for the benefits and make future child support payments. Marotta is asking that the case be dismissed, arguing that he's not legally the child's father, only a sperm donor.

A hearing is set for Tuesday.

Marotta told The Topeka-Capital Journal that he is "a little scared about where this is going to go, primarily for financial reasons."

[link to www.signalscv.com]

Pictures (click to insert)





\| Next Page >>