|
REPLY TO THREAD
|
|
Subject
|
One answer and one answer/test only to prove video upload and tweets have commo to each other. Does it pass the test?
|
|
User Name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Font color:
Font:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original Message
|
Due to copyright laws, and other internet regulations, do video services reserve the right to do what is called a "blanket change" internet wide INCLUDING tweets when a video format is changed and altered like what we are seeing with this joe ametrano and his vimeo vid???????? The reason i bring this up is that if your tweet is locked in with whatever you right but attach a video, i believe that once that video title and content is changed regardless of date time stamp, that video service automatically updates title and content to all domains internet wide associated to that video. For that, a test must be done. Simply to put this to rest quickly, fact or fiction, no in-betweens, u Must tweet a vimeo video today to get a date time stamp, go back into vimeo, upload replacement video and change title, then go back into twitter to see if that title changed automatically concurring with my copyright infringement statement. If you go back into twitter to view the original tweet, it should have the same date timestamp and "blanket" alter your original tweet. If it does not, you KNoW that whatevr was tweeted CANNOT be altered. If it is altered, you have what you call a "copyright blanket application" to avoid copyright infringement on the original video. If the video is altered with title and not updated across the board, it could hold up in court that whatever the original tweet was, is not current and actual data associated with the URL of that video link. Is that clear enough for everyone?????? One test, and one alone to put this to rest. Thank u for ur time.
|
|
Pictures (click to insert)
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | | | Next Page >> |
|
