Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 1,381 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 326,069
Pageviews Today: 521,929	Threads Today: 163	Posts Today: 3,074
06:45 AM

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject New, approved flu vaccine represents landmark in flu vaccine technology...

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

[quote:Anonymous Coward 31741081:MV8yMTE0MTQxXzM1NjYzNjU5XzhBMzZCQzYw]
[quote:mopar28m:MV8yMTE0MTQxXzM1NjYxMTU2X0I1Q0Y3RkZG]
[quote:Anonymous Coward 32551740:MV8yMTE0MTQxXzM1NjYwNjE3XzFCNTdGQjhE]
[quote:Anonymous Coward 31741081:MV8yMTE0MTQxXzM1NjUyODAxX0MxOEYwQTg=]
[quote:mopar28m:MV8yMTE0MTQxXzM1NjUxMjMyX0ExMUVEOEU5]
[quote:Anonymous Coward 31741081:MV8yMTE0MTQxXzM1NjQ4MzA5XzVDNEI1RUFG]
[quote:mopar28m:MV8yMTE0MTQxXzM1NjQ3MTg5X0NGNzUxMDlG]
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
Especially considering that the cdc claims themselves that only 10% of adverse events including death are actually reported to vaers. Of the very few investigations that have been done on vaers it shows that doctors only report 3% of adverse events including death.

But doctors wouldn't, not report a death for a vaccine that they injected if it happened to kill someone a week later would they? It's not like they would blame it on something else to cover themselves from litigation. Well, I mean if they weren't protected already by the government.
[/quote]

Doctors & CDC have to protect the vaccine program (or hoax I should say) one way or another.  Of course, they aren't going to report every single reaction.

Leslie is the person in the know about the Gardisil Cervarix shot.

http://holyhormones.com/vaccinations/hpv-vaccine/hpv-vaccine-adverse-events-reported-to-vaers/
[/quote]

You still don't get how things are reported do you?

Once again, an event is reported if it occurs in a certain time-frame post vaccination. These events do not take into account concurrent medications nor the patient's current health.
I.e. the adverse event does not have to be proven to have been caused by the vaccination, just that it happened.

So onto Janny's "evidence".
VAERS tables, as I hinted at earlier, are just a data dump. There is no comparative control group nor is there any way of splitting events from those actually caused by Gardsail to "natural" events. You know, those ones that occur all the time anyway.
Do you see what I'm getting at?

What you NEED to do, to offer REAL proof is to analyse each and every report, checking on any other medications, current health problems, time of onset etc etc etc.
VAERS really cannot be used to prove anything at all.

In fact if you look around you can find plenty of evidence of litigation lawyers manipulating VAERS data and even completing adverse event reports!

Certainly on your part it shows one of two things (probably both though); a complete lack of understanding of how you need to interpret and present data properly and an agenda which you are pushing.

Now the reasons for your agenda could be several;

A bad experience following a vaccine or other medical treatment (whether to yourself or someone else).
You have tried to claim or are in the middle of a litigation claim.
You follow the anti-vax nonsense like a sheep.
You really don't understand what you're doing, you just regurgitate nonsense.

As for doctors NOT reporting events...this shows that you don't understand the medico-legal aspects of reporting either.
A doctor is more likely to be sued if (s)he HASN"T filed a report rather than whether they have. The event reports are there to PROTECT doctors otherwise no doctor in their right mind would even consider filing a report. Ergo, what you find in the real world is that events are always over-reported.
As I mentioned earlier though, it's certainly not just doctors who file reports, non-medical staff file them too.

So to summarise, using VAERS to prove the correlation of vaccines with adverse events is like using sugar sales to prove the incidence of diabetes.
They're not related.
[/quote]

Original Message Our nation has reached a landmark in influenza vaccine history with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s approval of a new seasonal flu vaccine, called Flublok, made with novel technology.

This method uses recombinant DNA and a modified baculovirus (a virus that infects insects) to produce a safe and effective human flu vaccine.

Story Here:

[link to www.whptv.com]

Pictures (click to insert)





\| Next Page >>