Users Online Now:
GLP Poker Rooms
GiveMeGossip.com - Gossip Forum
Donate To GLP
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
BREAKING: Scientist claims comet ISON has companions!
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Dr. Astro:MV8yMTE2ODM2XzM1ODA0NDkzX0RCNURFMzU1] [quote:Dr. Astro:MV8yMTE2ODM2XzM1ODA0MzE3XzExQTZCQkMx] [quote:--Voltaic--:MV8yMTE2ODM2XzM1ODAzMzcxXzMzNDg4MUNC] [quote:Dr. Astro:MV8yMTE2ODM2XzM1NzU4NzE5XzgyNzdCQzA3] [quote:pstrusi:MV8yMTE2ODM2XzM1NzU4Njg5XzUyNzc2RDc5] [quote:Dr. Astro:MV8yMTE2ODM2XzM1Njk2MjMxXzU2MjJERENC] [quote:Anonymous Coward 1482109:MV8yMTE2ODM2X0ZCMzczM0VD] been following this guy, is an independent fully qualified scientist but does not sell out to the mainstream religion BS lies (NASA et al) now he has just posted on some new data on ISON http://www.jmccanneyscience.com/ [/quote] What a dipshit. He's full of shit. ISON does not have any "companions." I'll tell what happened, he saw this image floating around on conspiracy forums like this one claiming it shows "companions" near comet ISON and he latched onto it: http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2114053/pg1 These sorts of images often show asteroids as well as hot pixels, but those asteroids are nowhere near the comet, and the hot pixels are not even real objects at all. I'm betting he didn't even notice the asteroid at the top of the above image: http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2114053/reply35646307 Hot pixels don't even form point-spread functions, which is why that dipshit McCanney exclaimed that it "hadn't formed a coma." The lack of a point-spread function means it's not a real object, it's just noise in the imager. Asteroids and other real objects in space such as 2002 TY164 do, however, making them easy to distinguish. Obviously McCanney did not realize that. [/quote] Well, the only way to know this for sure will be when it is closer to Mars, to us...etc Maybe from September we'll have a better data to contrast. [/quote] No, we already know this for sure, the astrophotographer himself confirmed it. It's hot pixels, end of story. [/quote] No, we know of the hot pixels, we can't be 100% sure ISON is alone until it gets closer is what they are saying. [/quote] Oh really? You speak for the other poster? He said the only way to know "this" in direct response to what I was talking about. I was talking about the hot pixels in the image. [quote:Voltaic] And I agree, there could be things hitching a ride behind ISON. [/quote] Let's assume for a moment ISON is a fairly big comet at about 20km diameter for its physical nucleus. Its volume would then be about 4,188,790,200,000 m^3. If we assume a density of about 1500 kg/m^3 (and that's extremely generous, realistically it'd be closer to 400 kg/m^3) then the total mass is about 6.2831853 x 10^15 kg. If an object were orbiting a comet with that mass at any kind of distance, it wouldn't remain in orbit of it. If an object tried to orbit it at the distance that the moon is from earth, for instance, then it would take over 2000 years to complete a single orbit. It wouldn't even still be orbiting it though, it would have been stripped off by the sun by now. The comet is currently about 5 AUs from the sun. The current difference in gravitational acceleration due to the sun over the distance of the object orbiting the comet would be about 2.25 x 10-10 m/s^2. That may not sound like much, but it's two orders magnitude higher than the acceleration such an object would experience from the comet, which would only be about 2.84 x 10^-12 m/s^2. In other words, even if an object were "trailing" it as close as the moon is from earth, it would have been peeled off by the sun a while ago. At further orbital distances it would have been ripped away sooner still. In order to stably orbit the comet, an object would have to assume a much lower orbit and be virtually indistinguishable from the comet's nucleus. McCanney has claimed that the comet is being orbited by objects at two lunar distances. That is in direct contradiction to the evidence. The comet would have to be much, much more massive for that to be the case, and that is his claim indeed. He claims it's the size of the earth or larger. He's STILL claiming Pete's image of the comet showed "companions" but now he's now gone to claim that Pete's images were a NASA hoax to bait him into claiming the presence of companions so that they could then debunk it. He's a full-on nutjob. [quote:Voltaic] ISON may also break up into several smaller pieces as it gets closer to the Sun. Noting ISON hasn't been "melted" yet by the Sun as far as we know. [/quote] Things in space don't melt, they sublimate, and the comet is sublimating which is why it has a coma, it's just not all that much yet. Yes it could break up into pieces, and then those pieces would continue along the original orbit of the comet. What does that have to do with anything McCanney claimed? [/quote] By the way, that nutjob McCanney is claiming that Pete's images were a hoax to bait him into claiming his images showed companions and that this NASA video shows Pete's images without the companions as a way to debunk his claim: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_1HdOCOJ_Q He's lying and hoping people like me don't notice. The hot pixels are still there in the above NASA video. Pete's time lapse is the first segment show, as per McCanney's description, but the hot pixels are still there. [/quote]
been following this guy, is an independent fully qualified scientist but does not sell out to the mainstream religion BS lies (NASA et al)
now he has just posted on some new data on ISON
link to www.jmccanneyscience.com
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
Woman snaps photo of Waffle House prayer
Obama’s Proposed Ozone Regulations Would Ban 4th of July Celebrations
Get ready to kiss any home equity you have goodbye
What Goes Into A SlimJim?
Blue eyed-people at higher risk for alcohol dependency
Destroying America 101: The Blueprint Exists
Government Trolls Are Using ‘Psychology-Based Influence Techniques’ On YouTube, Facebook And Twitter
Doomsday Preppers Are Getting Ready For An Imminent Collapse
Deal Reached: Wireless Remote Drug-Releasing Microchip Implants On The Assembly Line
Facebook Can Now Identify You in Pictures Even Without Your Face Showing
Milk producers are dumping out hundreds of thousands of gallons of milk, right into fertilizer pits in order to drive prices back up.
Brain study sheds light on how new memories are formed
"The Fallout Ratio" Is Flashing Red - The Chart That Realtors Don't Want You To See
Solar Impulse attempts to cross weather front
We may be heading toward a new food economy that's more competitive and innovative.
Jade Helm The Hard Core Truth Finally Explained!
This Online Anonymity Box Puts You a Mile Away From Your IP Address
600 Dogs Mysteriously Jump From 'Haunted' Bridge In Scotland
Russia to ban Coca-Cola and Pepsi
DARPA: We Are Engineering the Organisms That Will Terraform Mars
Uber Faces Another Privacy Complaint - Tracking Users After Leaving Car?
Baltimore Police Called Out For Making Up ‘Gang Violence’ Stories To Scare Public
DHS/Police say criminals drive cars that's why they're using a new infrared license plate scanning system
Obama Issues 19 Classified Directives Changing Laws Passed by Congress
How Activists Won Reparations for the Survivors of Chicago Police Department Torture
This Flag Represents The Principle, "Fight For What You Believe In."
This Is The Rebel Flag, "You're Either Free Or You're Not."
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd. Godlike™
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2015 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.005s (5 queries)