Users Online Now:
GLP Poker Rooms
Donate To GLP
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
I'm an Atheist. Why should I believe in a god? Which god? and why?
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Don'tBeAfraid:MV8yMTE5ODU4XzM1NzU4MjgxXzhBQTk2MjUy] [quote:Anonymous Coward 23229603:MV8yMTE5ODU4XzM1NzU4MTY1XzExMDEzNTlD] [quote:Don'tBeAfraid:MV8yMTE5ODU4XzM1NzU4MTA4XzM5RUFFRUE3] [quote:Anonymous Coward 23229603:MV8yMTE5ODU4XzM1NzU3ODcyX0MxQ0NCQUE3] [quote:Don'tBeAfraid:MV8yMTE5ODU4XzM1NzU3Nzg1X0QzNkM3NEY2] [quote:Please be serious 32076855:MV8yMTE5ODU4XzEyQjZBOTNC] I'm an Atheist. Why should I believe in a god? Which god? and why? I'm considering god, but need a rational reason to actually believe. I would never take blind faith, as you could end up in any religion just dependant on the influence around you. Anyway, I'm searching, but need a rational way to decide. [/quote] Are you serious or playing? Using the intellect, and doing research, there are numerous proofs of God, but no matter how logical the arguments are, I doubt they are persuasive. Why? An argument appeals to the intellect. The intellect looks for observable phenomena (evidence), compares that to logical statements, listens to the voices of proponents and critics, and then analzes it himself or herself. What's missing? Love. Love is not logical. You can't prove it ever. There's some evidence but it's largely circumstancial. No one looking outside your heart (proponents or critics) or even the Beloved can know your heart. There's no way to validate it with analysis or logical or evidence. It won't compute. But because there's Free Will and assuming you're truly interested OP, then: http://www.philosophyofreligion.info/theistic-proofs/ Knock yourself out! Even if you disagree, they are elegant to read and study. [/quote] But you are comparing love, a natural human emotion with more evidence than just circumstancial as you say, with a supreme deity. That, does not make sense. [/quote] Well first, you asked for rational ways, so I provided a philosophical look (Metaphysics) at the existance of a supreme being. Before you discount anything, there's about 100 pages of logical reading, so I know you have read it yet. Second, while not all spiritual systems were relational, most were. Certainly monotheism is. The realtionship of YHWH is one based upon Love, and hence relevent. In YHWH there are two main principles. 1) God is the basis for Being or Existance. 2) God is the personification of Love. As such, you can't remove the Love element. [/quote] I believe that love is a natural human emotion that's being wrongfully exploited by basically suggesting that without god, there would be no love. [/quote] I don't think you're serious, just having some fun with Christians or other spiritual systems. If you're serious as you claim, then you'd spend some time actually reading the logical arguments that you asked for. Since you have not, then I doubt your intentions. I also think that you've had no training in philosophy or debate, for you are not answering questions in any logical way, only making some subjective observations, which you also are not proving by the way. You haven't built any logical statements, provided evidence of their veracity, or came to a conclusion as a result of reason and logic. But since you may be young, I'll indulge you. You said, "I believe that love is a natural human emotion that's being wrongfully exploited by basically suggesting that [b]without god, there would be no love.[/b]" Prove why that is so. You should know that you cannot prove a negative, at least near impossible for a beginner in debate. It's a logical fallacy. It's called Evidence of Absence. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_absence That statement is impossible to prove. Your statement is also false, for I never made that claim. To prove that the absence of X will result in the absence of Y is very difficult. [/quote]
I'm an Atheist. Why should I believe in a god? Which god? and why?
I'm considering god, but need a rational reason to actually believe. I would never take blind faith, as you could end up in any religion just dependant on the influence around you.
Anyway, I'm searching, but need a rational way to decide.
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
Researcher Finds Link Between Bankers & Wikileaks Affiliates Murders
Google/Amazon To "Echo" Everything & Everyone In Your Home To NSA
Scientists Discover New Lenses That Can See Invisible Entities
DEVELOPING: ‘Solar Winds’ Spur Geomagnetic Storm That May Affect Power
Awakened Humanity Awaits Fully Scripted Ending As Controversial Election Day Nears
WIKILEAKS : Hillary Camp Discusses Blaming Vengeful "Benghazi Republicans" For Hillary Email Scandal
A WARNING TO THE VOTERS OF THE UNITED STATES DO NOT VOTE FOR HILLARY CLINTON
$340 billion per year in US healthcare costs linked to chemicals found in plastic, detergents, cosmetics and toys
Election outcome scenarios reveal 95% chance of widespread post-election violence... streets of America to run red with blood
Leaked emails expose Coca-Cola's political strategy: a propaganda front against public health and soda taxes
No vaccine needed: Many children have become resistant to the effects of HIV through natural immunity
Over 1 million Americans to become uninsured as Obamacare collapse accelerates
Soylent food bars 'proudly made with GMOs' causing stomach problems, vomiting and diarrhea
Obamacare premiums skyrocket by double-digits as economically traumatized Americans scream ENOUGH!
They compromised the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES HIS FULL SCHEDULE AND LOCATIONS
Eric Braverman just asked for asylum from russia!!
Meet The Man Who Can Expose "The Real Hillary Clinton Scandal"
Leaked Email Reveals Sady Doyle, Other Liberal Bloggers Coordinated with Clinton Campaign on Sanders Hits
What The WikiLeaks Emails Reveal About Branding Hillary
WikiLeaks poisons Hillary’s relationship with left: After learning how Clinton feels about them, liberals vow to push back against her
WikiLeaks emails show Clinton and advisers calling liberal heroes “puritanical,” “pompous,” “naive” and “dumb”
Preparing for Post-Election Social Unrest
Fleet of Android Robots to Begin Policing the Streets by 2017
Exposed Viral Hoaxes Prove How Easy it is to Dupe the World with Disinfo
In an Oligarchy, Voting is a Tool to Manufacture the Illusion of Consent
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd. Godlike™
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2015 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.005s (5 queries)