Users Online Now:
Donate To GLP
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
I'm an Atheist. Why should I believe in a god? Which god? and why?
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 23229603:MV8yMTE5ODU4XzM1NzU4NDQ2X0JDRjVDNDRG] [quote:Don'tBeAfraid:MV8yMTE5ODU4XzM1NzU4MjgxXzhBQTk2MjUy] [quote:Anonymous Coward 23229603:MV8yMTE5ODU4XzM1NzU4MTY1XzExMDEzNTlD] [quote:Don'tBeAfraid:MV8yMTE5ODU4XzM1NzU4MTA4XzM5RUFFRUE3] [quote:Anonymous Coward 23229603:MV8yMTE5ODU4XzM1NzU3ODcyX0MxQ0NCQUE3] [quote:Don'tBeAfraid:MV8yMTE5ODU4XzM1NzU3Nzg1X0QzNkM3NEY2] [quote:Please be serious 32076855:MV8yMTE5ODU4XzEyQjZBOTNC] I'm an Atheist. Why should I believe in a god? Which god? and why? I'm considering god, but need a rational reason to actually believe. I would never take blind faith, as you could end up in any religion just dependant on the influence around you. Anyway, I'm searching, but need a rational way to decide. [/quote] Are you serious or playing? Using the intellect, and doing research, there are numerous proofs of God, but no matter how logical the arguments are, I doubt they are persuasive. Why? An argument appeals to the intellect. The intellect looks for observable phenomena (evidence), compares that to logical statements, listens to the voices of proponents and critics, and then analzes it himself or herself. What's missing? Love. Love is not logical. You can't prove it ever. There's some evidence but it's largely circumstancial. No one looking outside your heart (proponents or critics) or even the Beloved can know your heart. There's no way to validate it with analysis or logical or evidence. It won't compute. But because there's Free Will and assuming you're truly interested OP, then: http://www.philosophyofreligion.info/theistic-proofs/ Knock yourself out! Even if you disagree, they are elegant to read and study. [/quote] But you are comparing love, a natural human emotion with more evidence than just circumstancial as you say, with a supreme deity. That, does not make sense. [/quote] Well first, you asked for rational ways, so I provided a philosophical look (Metaphysics) at the existance of a supreme being. Before you discount anything, there's about 100 pages of logical reading, so I know you have read it yet. Second, while not all spiritual systems were relational, most were. Certainly monotheism is. The realtionship of YHWH is one based upon Love, and hence relevent. In YHWH there are two main principles. 1) God is the basis for Being or Existance. 2) God is the personification of Love. As such, you can't remove the Love element. [/quote] I believe that love is a natural human emotion that's being wrongfully exploited by basically suggesting that without god, there would be no love. [/quote] I don't think you're serious, just having some fun with Christians or other spiritual systems. If you're serious as you claim, then you'd spend some time actually reading the logical arguments that you asked for. Since you have not, then I doubt your intentions. I also think that you've had no training in philosophy or debate, for you are not answering questions in any logical way, only making some subjective observations, which you also are not proving by the way. You haven't built any logical statements, provided evidence of their veracity, or came to a conclusion as a result of reason and logic. But since you may be young, I'll indulge you. You said, "I believe that love is a natural human emotion that's being wrongfully exploited by basically suggesting that [b]without god, there would be no love.[/b]" Prove why that is so. You should know that you cannot prove a negative, at least near impossible for a beginner in debate. It's a logical fallacy. It's called Evidence of Absence. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_absence That statement is impossible to prove. Your statement is also false, for I never made that claim. To prove that the absence of X will result in the absence of Y is very difficult. [/quote] First, I never asked for anything. Second, just because I have a different view, which, by the way, is a view that I have developed long ago, you resort by saying I'm "young" and I've "had no training in debate and philosophy" etc., which is fairly typical from a believer who is usually stumped by a rational, logical thinking atheist. Also, the burden of proof rests squarely on the shoulders of those who claim the existence of a supreme deity. [/quote]
I'm an Atheist. Why should I believe in a god? Which god? and why?
I'm considering god, but need a rational reason to actually believe. I would never take blind faith, as you could end up in any religion just dependant on the influence around you.
Anyway, I'm searching, but need a rational way to decide.
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
Google open up users' archives of Gmail and Calendar for downloading
Surprise! Plenty of Obama money for these people Newest plan for stabilizing economy not intended to help U.S
Strange malware thought to communicate over computer speakers
Universe: Top scientists gather in Dallas to dissect space, matter, time
Great pyramids of the gophers? Digging deeper into the Mima mystery
Android to settle with FTC over flashlight app that sent location data to advertisers
Governments Will Eventually Have to Get in Bed with Cryptocurrencies
The Fight to Control the Global Climate
Food safety Supermarkets selling chicken that is nearly a fifth water
Female army members allegedly pressured into prostitution by officers at Ft. Hood
Airports Sue TSA over who guards the exits
Your iPhone Will Talk to Stores While You Shop
NYPD Orders Precincts to Deny Journalists Access to Crime Reports
IRS using Google Maps to spy on taxpayers
Microsoft Calls Government Spying an ĎAdvanced Persistent Threatí
Colonel Who Vowed to Disarm Americans Works With Homeland Security
When Will The Sun Poles Flip? NASA Scientist Explains
Private company plans US's first controlled moon landing in 40 years
It Looks Like Brian The Dog Will Be Back On 'Family Guy' After Being Killed Off
DARPA is definitely not building a giant death ray in space
Japan passes a democracy-muzzling Patriot Act
Privately Owned Prisons Suing States Over Lack Of Prisoners
Flashlight Android App Stole Users Information
Bank of America Sets a Value on BitCoin
Researchers show possibility of cloning quantum information from the past
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd.
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2014 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.005s (5 queries)