Users Online Now:
GLP Poker Rooms
Donate To GLP
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
I'm an Atheist. Why should I believe in a god? Which god? and why?
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Don'tBeAfraid:MV8yMTE5ODU4XzM1NzU4NDg1Xzg5NDlEQUY5] [quote:Anonymous Coward 23229603:MV8yMTE5ODU4XzM1NzU4NDQ2X0JDRjVDNDRG] [quote:Don'tBeAfraid:MV8yMTE5ODU4XzM1NzU4MjgxXzhBQTk2MjUy] [quote:Anonymous Coward 23229603:MV8yMTE5ODU4XzM1NzU4MTY1XzExMDEzNTlD] [quote:Don'tBeAfraid:MV8yMTE5ODU4XzM1NzU4MTA4XzM5RUFFRUE3] [quote:Anonymous Coward 23229603:MV8yMTE5ODU4XzM1NzU3ODcyX0MxQ0NCQUE3] [quote:Don'tBeAfraid:MV8yMTE5ODU4XzM1NzU3Nzg1X0QzNkM3NEY2] [quote:Please be serious 32076855:MV8yMTE5ODU4XzEyQjZBOTNC] I'm an Atheist. Why should I believe in a god? Which god? and why? I'm considering god, but need a rational reason to actually believe. I would never take blind faith, as you could end up in any religion just dependant on the influence around you. Anyway, I'm searching, but need a rational way to decide. [/quote] Are you serious or playing? Using the intellect, and doing research, there are numerous proofs of God, but no matter how logical the arguments are, I doubt they are persuasive. Why? An argument appeals to the intellect. The intellect looks for observable phenomena (evidence), compares that to logical statements, listens to the voices of proponents and critics, and then analzes it himself or herself. What's missing? Love. Love is not logical. You can't prove it ever. There's some evidence but it's largely circumstancial. No one looking outside your heart (proponents or critics) or even the Beloved can know your heart. There's no way to validate it with analysis or logical or evidence. It won't compute. But because there's Free Will and assuming you're truly interested OP, then: http://www.philosophyofreligion.info/theistic-proofs/ Knock yourself out! Even if you disagree, they are elegant to read and study. [/quote] But you are comparing love, a natural human emotion with more evidence than just circumstancial as you say, with a supreme deity. That, does not make sense. [/quote] Well first, you asked for rational ways, so I provided a philosophical look (Metaphysics) at the existance of a supreme being. Before you discount anything, there's about 100 pages of logical reading, so I know you have read it yet. Second, while not all spiritual systems were relational, most were. Certainly monotheism is. The realtionship of YHWH is one based upon Love, and hence relevent. In YHWH there are two main principles. 1) God is the basis for Being or Existance. 2) God is the personification of Love. As such, you can't remove the Love element. [/quote] I believe that love is a natural human emotion that's being wrongfully exploited by basically suggesting that without god, there would be no love. [/quote] I don't think you're serious, just having some fun with Christians or other spiritual systems. If you're serious as you claim, then you'd spend some time actually reading the logical arguments that you asked for. Since you have not, then I doubt your intentions. I also think that you've had no training in philosophy or debate, for you are not answering questions in any logical way, only making some subjective observations, which you also are not proving by the way. You haven't built any logical statements, provided evidence of their veracity, or came to a conclusion as a result of reason and logic. But since you may be young, I'll indulge you. You said, "I believe that love is a natural human emotion that's being wrongfully exploited by basically suggesting that [b]without god, there would be no love.[/b]" Prove why that is so. You should know that you cannot prove a negative, at least near impossible for a beginner in debate. It's a logical fallacy. It's called Evidence of Absence. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_absence That statement is impossible to prove. Your statement is also false, for I never made that claim. To prove that the absence of X will result in the absence of Y is very difficult. [/quote] First, I never asked for anything. Second, just because I have a different view, which, by the way, is a view that I have developed long ago, you resort by saying I'm "young" and I've "had no training in debate and philosophy" etc., which is fairly typical from a believer who is usually stumped by a rational, logical thinking atheist. Also, the burden of proof rests squarely on the shoulders of those who claim the existence of a supreme deity. [/quote] Oh no, my friend. I'm stating logically that you haven't done 50% of the work in the debate. You're not challenging my assertions in a logical way, and yet you chose to believe that you're logical. When was the last class you had in Logic, Debate, or Philosophy, because I'm not seeing any evidence of it in your post? And to the contrary, I enjoy being asked and am not in the remotest challenged, but I'm up for it. No, the burden of proof is not on the believer. Do you know the meaning of dialectic? I hope you look it up so we can go through that process. Saying, "Prove it." is not a debate or the search for Truth, it's a child's taunt. I'm sure you're intelligent, but I doubt your candor and intent. [/quote]
I'm an Atheist. Why should I believe in a god? Which god? and why?
I'm considering god, but need a rational reason to actually believe. I would never take blind faith, as you could end up in any religion just dependant on the influence around you.
Anyway, I'm searching, but need a rational way to decide.
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
Clinton Campaign Fudged Climate Change Data – Inflated Emission Numbers
Breaking the Black Box: How Machines Learn to Be Racist
BOOM!: British Bank FREEZES RT.com (Russia Today Media Outlet) Bank Accounts
BUSTED! Debate Camera Crew Caught Rigging Hillary’s Appearance Using Camera Filters, No Filters for Trump
Pentagon Officials Furious After Clinton Announces US Response Time for Nuclear Launch During Debate
Madonna pledges BJ for Clinton voters
Lead HPV vaccine developer comes clean, says its a giant deadly scam
Many soft drinks found to be contaminated with lead and cadmium
The Cancer Industry is too prosperous to allow a cure
Know the facts about root canals and their link to cancer
FLASH: All media reports will be rigged on election night to proclaim Clinton the winner no matter what... Trump urged to challenge the fraud
Is “Climate Change” Cover For Geoengineering? CIA Director Wants Spraying
3 Corporations That Manufacture BPA
5 Triggering Events That Would Place The U.S. Under Martial Law
Officials warn of ‘long overdue’ solar storm, EMP flare dangers…
Matt Drudge Warns Hillary Clinton of Coming “Sex Bombshell” To Be Revealed
Government seeks to replace co-pilots with robots…
Hot Dogs will be banned in Malaysia unless restaurants agree to change their name
Mystery Deepens Around Fate Of Julian Assange
DHS uses firefighters to enter homes and give everyone a 'fire risk assessment'
Scientists Have Turned Mouse Skin Cells Into Egg Cells and Made Babies
CIA-backed surveillance software was marketed to public schools
State Department H.Q. houses secretive Shadow Government’s “7th Floor group”
PUTIN GETS REAL – Now Russia tells the US ‘if you want a war you will get one EVERYWHERE’
Cops Monitoring Social Media Is Much More Than Just Collecting Tweets
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd. Godlike™
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2015 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.005s (5 queries)