Users Online Now:
2,312
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
812,529
Pageviews Today:
1,579,481
Threads Today:
645
Posts Today:
13,119
05:36 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
I am a member of the Illuminati: Open Q&A. No mocking or disbelief.
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:^Faceless^:MV8yMTIyMDkxXzM1ODA3MTIzXzk2NzAyREQ1] [quote:Anonymous Coward 32996962:MV8yMTIyMDkxXzM1ODA2ODY0X0RCMTUyMTk4] [quote:^Faceless^:MV8yMTIyMDkxXzM1ODA2NjI2XzVCRTlBOEJB] Isn't the private central banking system the center of your power. If a country of significance like the U.S. went away from the ponzi scheme, don't you think the resulting prosperity and escape from "austerity" would signal to the rest of the world to reform their financial systems as well? And when that happened you wouldn't just be able to sit back and extract wealth from the world while doing no work at all and then buy up gatekeeping positions in all the major industries to control the future, right? So, is that why the money as debt model is absolutely untouchable in the media and by politicians? And would you agree that the Federal Reserve (and central banking system), while the heart of your operation, is also the most fragile because it could lead to a domino effect around the world? And then sovereignty wouldn't be put under pressure always by the need to feed the ponzi scheme. Which would put less pressure on us to go to war. Which would make state and local governments more solvent and less desperate for your funds which come with strings attached including implementation of your desired police state. And then you wouldn't be able to buy up control of big business and pose as free market. And then you wouldn't be guaranteed control of the future. No wonder very few people ever utter anything about the essence of the financial system. But they should because it would solve so many problems to reform it. Isn't it enough for you just to run megabanks and get super rich? Do you really have to run the central banking ponzi scheme that will eventually suck all of the world into your control? Why are you so eager to dominate the actions of others? Shouldn't we instead, revere powerful people who choose to use their power more for human progress, and towards cures for disease or space travel? Why do so many people revere you so much? Because you're the most powerful group and people want in on that? I just want to be free and help progress humanity. But you and your buddies don't want that. You want to control my life. Is that supposed to be okay? And in your posts you say you don't like communism, but the way you describe your own desired system, sound like basically the same system, but run by corporations and banks. So is there really a difference? And didn't the banks help fund communism anyway? And so isn't communism vs. whatever you're offering just another false choice you offer humanity to divide and conquer? Sorry, but I had to get this stuff off my chest. It amazes me that in our age of high technology and access to information that we are moving towards the society you describe with so little resistance. You'd think people would demand more. But they don't. Strange. [/quote] The main 'weapon' in the Illuminati's manifesto against the ruling elite is the implementation of a 100% inheritance tax. That is exactly what it sounds like; ALL of a persons private wealth is surrendered to the commonwealth upon their death. I bet you're head is spinning at that one! Mine did too! When people first hear of this they get worked up into a frenzy of defensiveness, & in the limited scheme of our current way of life on earth rightly so! (I guess) I can hear all of the arguments now: "I've got taxed ALL MY FREAKING LIFE, NOW YOU WANT TO TAKE FROM MY CHILDREN WHAT I'VE WORKED HARD FOR???" But don't forget: you are only surrendering maybe a $100k or so house, the Rothchilds, Bush's ect. ect will be surrendering literally TRILLIONS!!! How do you think they gunna feel? And so fucking what??? They stole it all off of you & me in the first place! And also remember, thanks to our current way of life, nobody will have anything to leave to their kids anyway, except fucking debt!! The other aspect of the Illuminati's grand vision is Meritocracy, the best people for the job. Not dim-witted losers like the people who run things now! The brightest geniuses in control of the finance sector, ect, ect. No more boom & bust market capitalism. It is a futuristic concept that may not make sense to you at this time: my mind goes to the Star Trek movie (the one where they travel back in time, to the Borgs), when asked "how much the USS Enterprise 'cost' to build?" Captain Picard couldn't give an answer, & said "the economics of your time are somewhat different to ours." [/quote] Interesting stuff. Well, I may not like the vast wealth accumulated by some people by perhaps questionable means. But legislating wealth away is a slippery slope. Better to just legislate away the criminality and then we can be confident that people who got the most earned it and did so with some amount of honor/integrity and value added to society. I got no problem with that at all. As for the meritocracy. Again, it sounds good, but I wouldn't want the best people to be appointed by some "supreme council" or something like that. Through competition the best people will be determined. Obviously the playing field can sometimes be unfair, but that's what the govt. is for.... to set fair rules of play and not to pick the winners. We have too much cronyism as it is already. That's why I worry about the increasing consolidation of wealth and power, esp. amongst the banks. Will we be able to have a competitive future if only a few people get to decide who gets funds to carry out projects? Especially when those people seem preoccupied with spying on us more than curing diseases like cancer? So, I like your concept of the best people but it has to be decided by competition and not by appointment, I think in order for it to give us good results. Perhaps that's what you had in mind anyway, but I just wanted to state my thoughts. [/quote]
Original Message
Proceed.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>