Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 1,045 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 173,617
Pageviews Today: 283,253	Threads Today: 93	Posts Today: 1,683
03:05 AM

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject A fundamental right to procreate?

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

Original Message On Wednesday, Lorain County Probate Judge James T. Walther ordered the unemployed Taylor to pay nearly $100,000 in child support and banned him from having more children for five years unless he can show the court he can support the ones he already has. Otherwise, another child will earn him a year in jail.

And in an interview, Walther said he might order other deadbeat dads who owe significant amounts of child support to face the same punishment as part of their probation. Taylor is "not the worst of the worst," Walther said. "He's the first of the worst."

How did we get to this point, where a judge has to insist that a grown man curtail procreation so that his kids don't end up more impoverished than they are already? Doesn't that seem like common sense?

More at link:
[link to www.cleveland.com]

Pictures (click to insert)





\| Next Page >>