Users Online Now:
1,780
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
475,059
Pageviews Today:
778,729
Threads Today:
265
Posts Today:
4,959
09:25 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Oates Disputes Reverse Speech 'April Nuclear Attack'
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 75395:MV8yMTM1MzBfNDAxNDM0MV85NTczQzczQQ==] YEAH! I've never understood why people that require strict empirical proof are doing commenting on a conspiracy/speculation board like GLP... "it cannot exist, it doesn't fit into my neat little box" ~go someplace else, :dumbass: [/quote]
Original Message
Press Release
From David John Oates
Founder of Reverse Speech
ReverseSpeech.com
3-28-6
Regarding alleged findings by Reverse Speech of a 'nuclear attack' in Texas in April...
There is a controversy currently raging about an alleged nuclear attack on US soil supposedly due to occur in April 2006 around Easter. This controversy has been started in part by the website [
link to www.ken-welch.com.
] In this site Ken Welch uses alleged examples of Reverse Speech taken from key figures in the US administration as proof of his claims.
I have examined Ken Welch's site and his alleged speech reversals and have found nearly all of them to be invalid. The alleged reversals do not meet even the basic requirements for a speech reversal to be valid and as such they do not exist. Ken Welch has had no training in Reverse Speech and this is evidenced by the gibberish he has posted and the inappropriate format with which they are presented..
Based on the alleged evidence posted on this site I can state quite categorically that there will be no nuclear attack on US soil in April 2006 and speech reversals do not support this scenario. They do not show complicity and knowledge of this so-called attack by key governmental people as Ken Welch's site claims.
The study of Reverse Speech is a complicated science and unless appropriate guidelines are followed, and professional training undertaken, it is possible to imagine anything into the gibberish. I am concerned by this and others claims being made by people who have taken no formal training in the field.
David J Oates
Founder and Developer of Reverse Speech technologies
[
link to www.reversespeech.com.
]
For the story about Mr. Welch's predicton, go here:
NWO Master Plan - Nuke Texas?
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>