Users Online Now:
2,328
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
493,944
Pageviews Today:
809,259
Threads Today:
269
Posts Today:
4,472
09:43 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:George B:MV8yMTQ1MjAzXzM2OTY5NzE3XzNEQTRCMERG] [quote:Anonymous Coward 36488183:MV8yMTQ1MjAzXzM2OTY5NjYyXzM0REI4QTA=] [quote:George B:MV8yMTQ1MjAzXzM2OTY5MDk5XzE3OEEwMTU1] [quote:George B:MV8yMTQ1MjAzXzM2OTY4NjQ4XzY5MTI1NDU5] [quote:George B:MV8yMTQ1MjAzXzM2OTY4NDE5XzYwRTY0NEU0] [quote:Anonymous Coward 37081348:MV8yMTQ1MjAzXzM2OTY4MzA0XzIwMzFGOUQ=] anyone with even one working eye can observe the shit being spewed in the sky every day cunts are blocking the sunlight for one thing - everything needs sunlight only a blind man could miss it [/quote] So you think it is a conspiracy to promote global dimming and reduce food production?:coffee4::Canadian F: [/quote] Interesting you should point to global dimming . . . 1) The decade of 1990s had a dip in stratospheric aerosols. This dip (see below) was caused by the clearing of the atmosphere in the 90s. "Hofmann and coworkers (12–14) argued that the “background” stratospheric aerosol layer increased by 5- 9%/year through the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s, and again at about 5-7% in the 2000s. [b]However, in the 1990s stratospheric aerosols decreased by similar magnitudes.[/b] " http://junksciencecom.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/solomon-07-22-11.pdf 2)[b] Within the same article cited above are definitive statements that stratospheric particulate (aerosols) increased during the [u]late 1990s [/u]- 2000s effectively reversing the negative trend in the early 1990s using three different methods . . .[/b] "Multiple instruments have been used at Mauna Loa for estimating or measuring total aerosol optical depth and atmospheric transmission. Here we present observations taken there on the cleanest days, when much of the aerosol burden likely resides in the stratosphere. Figure 2 shows three independent data records that all indicate increases in aerosol optical depth (or, equivalently, decreases in transmission) at Mauna Loa from the late 1990s to the late 2000s: from ground-based transmission data using the pyrheliometer ratioing methodology (20, 21), a Precision Filter Radiometer [1999 to date (22)], and a stratospheric lidar (14). Figure 2 compares these data to the mean tropical and global stratospheric aerosol optical depths from combined satellite observations by the Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) II (1990–2005), Global Ozone Monitoring by Occultation of Stars (GOMOS, 2002-2009) and the CALIPSO lidar (2006–2010), see (16, 17, 23–25); the overlapping periods of the different satellite instruments allow accurate quantification of the trends over time (17). The four independent data sets from satellite, lidar, total transmission, and aerosol optical depth as shown in Fig. 2 jointly support the view that the “background” stratospheric aerosol layer has changed significantly over about the past decade [see (25)]." http://junksciencecom.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/solomon-07-22-11.pdf http://data.giss.nasa.gov/modelforce/strataer/#References [/quote] So what happened at the end of the 1990s . . . say 1999 until 2010 . . . ??? An increase in stratospheric particulate . . . mostly Sulfur Dioxide . . . but no major volcanic eruptions . . . Hmmmmm. . . what could have happened?:verycool: [/quote] Again, what is your point? [/quote] "The reasons for the 10-year increase in stratospheric aerosols [color=red][u][b]are not fully understood [/b][/u][/color]and are the subject of ongoing research, says coauthor Ryan Neely, with the University of Colorado and the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES). [b]Likely suspects are natural sources – smaller volcanic eruptions – [u][color=red]and/or human activities[/color][/u][/b], which could have emitted the sulfur-containing gases, such as sulfur dioxide, that react in the atmosphere to form reflective aerosol particles." http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2011/20110721_particles.html [i][b]More particulate in the stratosphere than can be explained [/b][/i]= ([color=red]unknown source[/color]) + declining ground sources - major volcanic eruptions ([color=red]unknown source[/color]) = some unknown volcanic activity Or possibly ([color=red]unknown source[/color]) = intentional aerosol injection program [/quote]
Original Message
If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
1) TV news stories about them . . .
2) I have dreams about them . .
3) Documentaries about them on the History Channel . . .
4) YouTube Videos about chemtrails
5) Reading about different conspiracies they mentioned them . . .
6) My friends and/or family talk about them . . .
7) There are websites I visit that talk about them . . .
8) I see persistent trails in the skies . . .
9) Rap songs or other entertainment including celebrities
10) Scientific papers, patents, symposia (mainstream)
11) Papers, articles, symposia by other chemtrail believes
12) Other. . . please specify in this Thread. . . .
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>