Users Online Now:
2,611
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,408,418
Pageviews Today:
2,030,846
Threads Today:
568
Posts Today:
10,961
04:33 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:George B:MV8yMTQ1MjAzXzM2OTkyMTE3XzZDNzhEQ0JE] [quote:Anonymous Coward 36488183:MV8yMTQ1MjAzXzM2OTkwNDg2XzY2N0Y1RDAy] [quote:George B:MV8yMTQ1MjAzXzM2OTgzNDEwXzcxMEJDNTIw] Ironic isn't it (The Glory Aerosol Polarimetry Sensor)-[b]the one instrument that could have answered many of the needed answers about aerosols possible origins and climatic effects was a Raytheon project[/b] . . . and . . .[color=red][b] was somehow lost by a failed launch!!! What are the odds?????[/b][/color]:ohno: --------- Raytheon’s Aerosol Polarimetry Sensor Raytheon’s Aerosol Polarimetry Sensor (APS) will measure aerosols in Earth’s atmosphere to provide scientists and policy makers a better understanding of how those aerosols affect global climate change. “The Glory Aerosol Polarimetry Sensor can distinguish between various types of aerosols and reveal the different role each plays in either warming or cooling our planet,” said Bill Hart, vice president, Space Systems. “Since black carbon aerosols generally contribute to warming, and sulfate aerosols to cooling, the concentrations of these aerosols and others must be determined to ensure accurate climate modeling.” [color=red]Both natural and man-made aerosols are important constituents of the atmosphere that affect global temperature. Yet they remain poorly quantified and, according to NASA scientists, represent the largest uncertainty regarding climate change.[/color] http://www.raytheon.com/capabilities/products/gloryaps/ [b]On 4 March 2011, the Aerosol Polarimetry Sensor (APS) was lost as a consequence of the failed launch of the Glory Mission.[/b] On 6 March 2011, Dr. Michael Freilich, Director of the Earth Science Division, Science Mission Directorate, NASA Headquarters, directed the Glory APS Science Team to perform a comprehensive study intended to develop and evaluate the science rationale for an APS reflight. http://glory.giss.nasa.gov/ Third time's the charm . . . incompetence personified . . . seems beyond even the government to use the same failed company . . . unless you have a reason to make all climate analysis systems fall into the ocean . . . LoL!!!!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ani0luPe7qc&feature=youtube_gdata_player [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ani0luPe7qc&feature=youtube_gdata_player[/youtube] Both the rocket and the satellite were built by Orbital Sciences Corp. of Dulles, Va. . . . and they still have the contract for the next launch . . . !!!!! http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2011/03/04/04greenwire-science-satellites-crash-leaves-nasa-devastate-66697.html [/quote] Check the statistics. Many satellites are lost to launch failure. It wasn't the first and probably won't be the last [/quote] I did . . . see below . . . [b]very low failure rates but the failures seem to cluster around primarily environmental atmospheric observation satellites . . .[/b] :another do: [color=red][b]Looks almost like a pattern . . .[/b][/color] [b] . . . Some interesting evidence of the low probability of launch failures of both of the rockets and the satellites except for those that were built by Orbital Sciences Corp. of Dulles, Va. . . . and they still have the contract for the next launch . . . !!!!! ---------[/b] Second Quarter 2009 Launch Report 1 The Second Quarter 2009 Quarterly Launch Report features launch results from the first quarter of 2009 ( January - March 2009) Figure 13 shows orbital and commercial suborbital launch successes vs. failures for the period from January 2009 to March 2009. Partially-successful orbital launch events are those where the launch vehicle fails to deploy its payload to the appropriate orbit, but the payload is able to reach a useable orbit via its own propulsion systems. Cases in which the payload does not reach a useable orbit or would use all of its fuel to do so are considered failures. [b]-----The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) is a NASA satellite mission intended to provide ... The original spacecraft was lost in a launch failure on February 24, 2009, when the payload ...[/b] Figure 13: First Quarter 2009 Launch Successes vs. Failures [b]Failure 6% (1)[/b] Success 94% (15) Total = 16 http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/media/2Q2009%20Quarterly%20Report.pdf --------- http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/media/HQ-121473.pdf Launch Successes vs. Failures Figure 9: Launch Successes vs. Failures: April 2011 - September 2011 [b]Failure 7% (3)[/b] Success 93% (42) [b]-----The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) is a NASA satellite mission intended to provide ... The original spacecraft was lost in a launch failure on February 24, 2009, when the payload ...[/b] Semi-Annual Launch Report Second Half of Fiscal Year 2011 Figure 9 shows orbital launch successes and failures from April 2011 through September 2011. From April 2011 to September 2011 there were three launch failures. From September 2010 to April 2011 there were four launch failures. Total = 45 launches ------------ Semi-Annual Launch Report: First Half of 2010 http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/media/semi_annual_launch_report_051810.pdf Figure 9: Launch Successes vs. Failures: October 2009 - March 2010 [b]Failure 0% (0)[/b] Total = 33 Success 100% (33) ------------ Semi-Annual Launch Report: First Half of 2010 http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/media/semi_annual_launch_report_051810.pdf Figure 9: Launch Successes vs. Failures: October 2009 - March 2010 Total 33 no failures ------------ [/quote]
Original Message
If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
1) TV news stories about them . . .
2) I have dreams about them . .
3) Documentaries about them on the History Channel . . .
4) YouTube Videos about chemtrails
5) Reading about different conspiracies they mentioned them . . .
6) My friends and/or family talk about them . . .
7) There are websites I visit that talk about them . . .
8) I see persistent trails in the skies . . .
9) Rap songs or other entertainment including celebrities
10) Scientific papers, patents, symposia (mainstream)
11) Papers, articles, symposia by other chemtrail believes
12) Other. . . please specify in this Thread. . . .
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>