Users Online Now:
2,212
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
506,571
Pageviews Today:
869,044
Threads Today:
386
Posts Today:
5,892
11:07 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
FOX NEWS: Reeva Steenkamp’s autopsy revealed she was beaten with cricket bat BEFORE Pistorius shot her.
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:UndercoverAlien:MV8yMTUyMTY2X0YzNzNDREIx] Watch the video inside the link! Megyn Kelly wildly argues with Fox News legal consultant, who stutters like a lying cunt while trying to sell the pathetic theory that Reeva's head blood magically squirted in the cricket bat while Pistorius was breaking the bathroom door. [quote:http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/02/25/bombshell-report-in-oscar-pistorius-case-autopsy-reveals-reeva-steenkamp-was-beaten-with-a-cricket-bat-before-she-was-shot/]The Daily Mail reports new details that could prove explosive in the Oscar Pistorius murder case. According to the reports, Reeva Steenkamp’s autopsy revealed that her skull was crushed by a bloody cricket bat before she was shot in the head. Pistorius claims that he used the bat to break down the bathroom door, and it’s at that point that he realized he was shooting his girlfriend and not an intruder. So, if these reports are true, why didn’t the prosecution mention the bat or the fact that Steenkamp’s skull was bashed in during last week’s bail hearing? While Lis Wiehl said that it is common in the U.S. for prosecutors to withhold some evidence at bail hearings, she thinks that this is such key evidence that prosecutors probably didn’t have it at the time of the hearing(...)[/quote] [/quote]
Original Message
Watch the video inside the link! Megyn Kelly wildly argues with Fox News legal consultant, who stutters like a lying cunt while trying to sell the pathetic theory that Reeva's head blood magically squirted in the cricket bat while Pistorius was breaking the bathroom door.
The Daily Mail reports new details that could prove explosive in the Oscar Pistorius murder case. According to the reports, Reeva Steenkamp’s autopsy revealed that her skull was crushed by a bloody cricket bat before she was shot in the head.
Pistorius claims that he used the bat to break down the bathroom door, and it’s at that point that he realized he was shooting his girlfriend and not an intruder.
So, if these reports are true, why didn’t the prosecution mention the bat or the fact that Steenkamp’s skull was bashed in during last week’s bail hearing?
While Lis Wiehl said that it is common in the U.S. for prosecutors to withhold some evidence at bail hearings, she thinks that this is such key evidence that prosecutors probably didn’t have it at the time of the hearing(...)
Quoting:
[
link to foxnewsinsider.com
]
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>